UAVSAR G-III Precision Autopilot Overview and Results
This viewgraph presentation gives a general overview of the Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar (UAVSAR) G-III precision autopilot.
Lin, Victor↗
Engineering topics
Strovers, Brian
Publications and source records attributed to Strovers, Brian.
The X-43A Six Degree of Freedom Monte Carlo Analysis
This report provides an overview of the Hyper-X research vehicle Monte Carlo analysis conducted with the six-degree-of-freedom simulation. The methodology and model uncertainties used for the Monte Carlo analysis are presented as permitted. In addition, the process used to select hardware validation test cases from the Monte Carlo data is described. The preflight Monte Carlo analysis indicated that the X-43A control system was robust to the preflight uncertainties and provided the Hyper-X project an important indication that the vehicle would likely be successful in accomplishing the mission objectives. The X-43A inflight performance is compared to the preflight Monte Carlo predictions and shown to exceed the Monte Carlo bounds in several instances. Possible modeling shortfalls are presented that may account for these discrepancies. The flight control laws and guidance algorithms were robust enough as a result of the preflight Monte Carlo analysis that the unexpected in-flight performance did not have undue consequences. Modeling and Monte Carlo analysis lessons learned are presented.
Baumann, Ethan↗
The X-43A Six Degree of Freedom Monte Carlo Analysis
This report provides an overview of the Hyper-X research vehicle Monte Carlo analysis conducted with the six-degree-of-freedom simulation. The methodology and model uncertainties used for the Monte Carlo analysis are presented as permitted. In addition, the process used to select hardware validation test cases from the Monte Carlo data is described. The preflight Monte Carlo analysis indicated that the X-43A control system was robust to the preflight uncertainties and provided the Hyper-X project an important indication that the vehicle would likely be successful in accomplishing the mission objectives. The X-43A in-flight performance is compared to the preflight Monte Carlo predictions and shown to exceed the Monte Carlo bounds in several instances. Possible modeling shortfalls are presented that may account for these discrepancies. The flight control laws and guidance algorithms were robust enough as a result of the preflight Monte Carlo analysis that the unexpected in-flight performance did not have undue consequences. Modeling and Monte Carlo analysis lessons learned are presented.
Baumann, Ethan↗
G-III Precision Autopilot Development in Support of UAVSAR Program
The primary objective of the UAVSAR Project is to develop a miniaturized polarimetric L-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) for use on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) or minimally piloted vehicle. Five Cycle 1 precision autopilot flights have been completed as of May 14, 2007. The first flight was open-loop controller, the second, third, fourth, and fifth flights were closed loop. The fifth flight demonstrated increasing duration within ten meter tube (approximately 90% of the time in the ten meter tube over a 200km course).
Lee, James↗
G-III Precision Autopilot Development in Support of UAVSAR Program
This viewgraph presentation reviews NASA Dryden's role in the UAVSAR Program. The primary objective of the UAVSAR Project is to develop a miniaturized polarimetric L-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) for use on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) or minimally piloted vehicle. Dryden's work in developing the Platform Precision Autopilot (PPA) capability is described in this presentation. The goal for the development is that the PPA shall fly the G-III within a 10 m (32.8 ft) diameter tube for at least 90% of each data take in conditions of calm to light atmospheric disturbances, as defined. The G-III aircraft is descrbed, the test plan is outlined, and the initial test results are reviewed.
Lee, James↗
The X-43A Hyper-X Mach 7 Flight 2 Guidance, Navigation, and Control Overview and Flight Test Results
The objective of the Hyper-X program was to flight demonstrate an airframe-integrated hypersonic vehicle. On March 27, 2004, the Hyper-X program team successfully conducted flight 2 and achieved all of the research objectives. The Hyper-X research vehicle successfully separated from the Hyper-X launch vehicle and achieved the desired engine test conditions before the experiment began. The research vehicle rejected the disturbances caused by the cowl door opening and the fuel turning on and off and maintained the engine test conditions throughout the experiment. After the engine test was complete, the vehicle recovered and descended along a trajectory while performing research maneuvers. The last data acquired showed that the vehicle maintained control to the water. This report will provide an overview of the research vehicle guidance and control systems and the performance of the vehicle during the separation event and engine test. The research maneuvers were performed to collect data for aerodynamics and flight controls research. This report also will provide an overview of the flight controls related research and results.
Bahm, Catherine↗