Engineering topics
Summers, Kelly L.
Publications and source records attributed to Summers, Kelly L..
Synthesis and structural characterization of copper–cuprizone complexes
The chemistry of copper with cuprizone has challenged chemists for over 70 years. We characterize the classical ‘blue’ product, containing Cu( iii ) and hydrolyzed cuprizone, and a green multimeric Cu( ii ) product, containing unhydrolyzed cuprizone.
PBT2 acts through a different mechanism of action than other 8-hydroxyquinolines: an X-ray fluorescence imaging study
8-Hydroxyquinolines (8HQs) comprise a family of metal-binding compounds that have been used or tested for use in numerous medicinal applications, including as treatments for bacterial infection, Alzheimer's disease, and cancer. Two key 8HQs, CQ (5-chloro-7-iodo-8-hydroxyquinoline) and PBT2 (2-(dimethylamino)methyl-5,7-dichloro-8-hydroxyquinoline), have drawn considerable interest and have been the focus of many studies investigating their in vivo properties. These drugs have been described as copper and zinc ionophores because they do not cause metal depletion, as would be expected for a chelation mechanism, but rather cellular accumulation of these ions. In studies of their anti-cancer properties, CQ has been proposed to elicit toxic intracellular copper accumulation and to trigger apoptotic cancer cell death through several possible pathways. In this study we used synchrotron X-ray fluorescence imaging, in combination with biochemical assays and light microscopy, to investigate 8HQ-induced alterations to metal ion homeostasis, as well as cytotoxicity and cell death. We used the bromine fluorescence from a bromine labelled CQ congener (5,7-dibromo-8-hydroxyquinoline; B2Q) to trace the intracellular localization of B2Q following treatment and found that B2Q crosses the cell membrane. We also found that 8HQ co-treatment with Cu(ii) results in significantly increased intracellular copper and significant cytotoxicity compared with 8HQ treatments alone. PBT2 was found to be more cytotoxic, but a weaker Cu(ii) ionophore than other 8HQs. Moreover, treatment of cells with copper in the presence of CQ or B2Q resulted in copper accumulation in the nuclei, while PBT2-guided copper was distributed near to the cell membrane. Furthermore, these results suggest that PBT2 may be acting through a different mechanism than that of other 8HQs to cause the observed cytotoxicity.
Solution Chemistry of Copper(II) Binding to Substituted 8-Hydroxyquinolines
8-Hydroxyquinolines (8HQs) are a family of lipophilic metal ion chelators that have been used in a range of analytical and pharmaceutical applications over the last 100 years. More recently, CQ (clioquinol; 5-chloro-7-iodo-8-hydroxyquinoline) and PBT2 (5,7-dichloro-2-[(dimethylamino)methyl]-8-hydroxyquinoline) have undergone clinical trials for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and Huntington’s disease. Because CQ and PBT2 appear to redistribute metals into cells, these compounds have been redefined as copper and zinc ionophores. Despite the attention surrounding the clinical trials and the clear link between 8HQs and metals, the fundamental solution chemistry of how these compounds bind divalent metals such as copper and zinc, as well as their mechanism(s) of action in mammalian systems, remains poorly understood. Here, we used a combination of X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), high-energy resolution fluorescence detected (HERFD) XAS, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), and UV–visible absorption spectroscopies to investigate the aqueous solution chemistry of a range of 8HQ derivatives. To circumvent the known solubility issues with 8HQ compounds and their complexes with Cu(II), and to avoid the use of abiological organic solvents, we have devised a surfactant buffer system to investigate these Cu(II) complexes in aqueous solution. Our study comprises the first comprehensive investigation of the Cu(II) complexes formed with many 8HQs of interest in aqueous solution, and it provides the first structural information on some of these complexes. We find that halogen substitutions in 8HQ derivatives appear to have little effect on the Cu(II) coordination environment; 5,7-dihalogenated 8HQ conformers all have a pseudo square planar Cu(II) bound by two quinolin-8-olate anions, in agreement with previous studies. Conversely, substituents in the 2-position of the 8HQ moiety appear to cause significant distortions from the typical square-planar-like coordination of most Cu(II)-bis-8HQ complexes, such that the 8HQ moieties in the Cu(II)-bis-8HQ complex are rotated approximately 30–40° apart in a “propeller-like” arrangement.
Studies of selenium and arsenic mutual protection in human HepG2 cells
Hundreds of millions of people worldwide are exposed to unacceptable levels of carcinogenic inorganic arsenic. Animal models have shown that selenium and arsenic are mutually protective through the formation and elimination of the seleno-bis(S-glutathionyl) arsinium ion [(GS) 2 AsSe] - . Consistent with this, human selenium deficiency in arsenic-endemic regions is associated with arsenic-induced disease, leading to the initiation of human selenium supplementation trials. In contrast to the protective effect observed in vivo, in vitro studies have suggested that selenite increases arsenite cellular retention and toxicity. This difference might be explained by the rapid conversion of selenite to selenide in vivo. In the current study, selenite did not protect the human hepatoma (HepG2) cell line against the toxicity of arsenite at equimolar concentrations, however selenide increased the IC 50 by 2.3-fold. Cytotoxicity assays of arsenite + selenite and arsenite + selenide at different molar ratios revealed higher overall mutual antagonism of arsenite + selenide toxicity than arsenite + selenite. Despite this protective effect, in comparison to 75 Se-selenite, HepG2 cells in suspension were at least 3-fold more efficient at accumulating selenium from reduced 75 Se-selenide, and its accumulation was further increased by arsenite. X-ray fluorescence imaging of HepG2 cells also showed that arsenic accumulation, in the presence of selenide, was higher than in the presence of selenite. These results are consistent with a greater intracellular availability of selenide relative to selenite for protection against arsenite, and the formation and retention of a less toxic product, possibly [(GS) 2 AsSe] - .