Engineering topics

Swearingen, Alexander Lee

Publications and source records attributed to Swearingen, Alexander Lee.

3 records

DOE OSTI2024

Status Report on Fast Flux Test Facility Mechanistic Fuel Failure Experiment Analysis with BISON for Post Irradiation Examination Support

The renewed interest in metallic U-Zr nuclear fuel alloy has led to a drive for deeper understanding of the mechanisms driving the phenomena observed under irradiation conditions. The Department of Energy Advanced Fuel Campaign has developed infrastructure to support metallic fuel development, including Post Irradiation Examination (PIE) of legacy Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) Mechanistic Fuel Failure (MFF) experiments. The PIE performed on legacy FFTF MFF experiments gives insight on metallic fuel performance and can address the lack of knowledge and scarcity of reliable data identified in several studies over recent years. Unfortunately, PIE efforts can cost significant time and resources which can impede the progress of metallic U-Zr fuel development. Metallic U-Zr fuel performance modeling can be used to inform PIE efforts on regions of interest for relevant investigations and can help understand phenomena observed in PIE. This report demonstrates the current progress of FFTF MFF fuel performance simulations using the BISON fuel performance code and discusses the support provided by simulation to PIE efforts. Progress in temperature, profilometry, fission gas release, plenum pressure, and zirconium redistribution simulation results have been demonstrated.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Evaluation of Irradiation Creep Effects in HT9 Cladding for FAST Experiments

The push for advanced reactor fuels for improved reactor safety and efficiency had led to a renewed interest in metallic fuel for nuclear reactor applications. Experimental investigation is necessary to ensure a robust understanding of the thermomechanical properties of new metallic fuel designs. Unfortunately, with the current experimental facilities, thoroughly investigating the responses of metallic fuel burnup would take a prohibitively long time. To alleviate this, the Fission Accelerated Steady State Test (FAST) was developed to accelerate the irradiation testing while simultaneously decreasing the sensitivity to fabrication tolerances by reducing the fuel diameter and scaling the experiment. This method successfully scales the radiation effects on the fuel, but the HT9 cladding is not exposed to prototypic radiation conditions. This raises questions on whether the FAST experiment results are truly indicative of the HT9 cladding performance due to radiation induced creep effects not being appropriately accounted for. Using BISON fuel performance code, the simulated FAST cladding strain is compared to simulated EBR-II cladding strain. This is done through a sensitivity study of input parameters and scaling of neutron fluence on the cladding. This allows a parametric comparison of physical phenomena on the effective difference between cladding strains between FAST and equivalent burnup EBR-II fuel pins. The results show that the irradiation induced deformation (creep or swelling) is insignificant compared to the thermal-mechanical deformation. Therefore, the difference between the FAST experiment cladding and the EBR-II experiment cladding is negligible and comparison of fuel system performance between the two experiments is appropriate.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Comparison of FAST Experiments to BISON Simulations

The Fission Accelerated Steady-State Test (FAST) experiments utilize the effects of scaling to accelerate the burnup experienced by the fuel. This experimental technique offers a unique opportunity to evaluate the effects of scaling on fuel and cladding material modelling. Currently, models used in the BISON fuel performance code for metallic fuel performance are calibrated for EBR-II conditions and geometries. Comparing BISON simulations to FAST experimental data will allow for the identification of shortcomings in the models for conditions outside the EBR-II paradigm. FAST experiments have been performed on U-Zr and U-10Mo fuel types with HT9 cladding. Initial comparisons of simulated cladding strains to experimental results show that the BISON simulations consistently overpredict cladding strain in the fuel region but underpredict the cladding strain in the plenum region. This indicates potential issues with the simulation of swelling and gas pressure at smaller geometries. Further comparison with fission gas release measurements is planned as data becomes available.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗