Engineering topics

Taylor-Pashow, Kathryn M.

Publications and source records attributed to Taylor-Pashow, Kathryn M..

9 records

DOE OSTI2022

Characterization of Tank 9h Salt Dissolution Batch 2C In Support of Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A Batch 2 Preparations

Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) is currently preparing the second batch of material to be processed through the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A system. The feed for TCCR 1A consists of dissolved saltcake from Tank 9H. The third batch of salt to make up processing Batch 2 (Batch 2C) has recently been dissolved in Tank 9H and transferred to Tank 10H where it was composited with the first part of the batch (Batches 2A and 2B) in preparation for processing through the TCCR 1A unit. Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) received samples from the recent batch (2C) of dissolved salt for characterization.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2022

Characterization of Tank 11H Samples from Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR 1A) Batch 1

Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR 1A) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. The TCCR 1A unit processes dissolved salt fed from Tank 10H through a series of ion exchange columns containing crystalline silicotitanate (CST, IONSIV TM R9120-B, 30x60) and the effluent is then discharged to Tank 11H. In support of the TCCR 1A program, SRNL analyzed samples taken from Tank 11H (without tank mixing) before, during, and at the completion of TCCR 1A Batch 1 processing. Tank 11H serves as the receipt tank for the filtered and cesium removed product from the TCCR 1A system. Processing of Batch 1 commenced on January 13, 2022 and completed on February 17, 2022, after processing approximately 70,100 gallons. A pre-production sample was collected from the heel remaining in Tank 11H just before Batch 1 processing began. In addition, five interim surface samples were collected from Tank 11H during processing, and both a surface and a variable depth sample (VDS, ~7” from tank bottom) were collected just after processing completed. Analysis of all samples included density and gamma spectroscopy, in addition to a more comprehensive suite of analytes for the pre- and post-production samples. The density of the pre-production sample was the highest of all samples measured and was then observed to decrease for the first two interim samples, followed by becoming fairly consistent for the remainder of the samples (~1.3 g/mL). The density of 1.3 g/mL is similar to the density measured for one of the three Tank 10H qualification samples (HTF-10-21-126). The 137 Cs activity was found to decrease as additional decontaminated effluent from the TCCR columns was added to Tank 11H during processing; however, an increase in activity was observed during periods of no processing which can be attributed to leaching of 137 Cs from the known solids in Tank 11H. The Cs isotope concentrations in the Tank 11H postproduction surface sample were determined to be 99.7-99.8% lower than the concentrations measured in the Tank 10H feed as measured by mass spectrometry.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Summary of Results from Batch 1 Qualification Samples for Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR 1A)

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR 1A) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. As part of that process, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) receives and analyzes samples in support of the qualification of each waste supernate batch to be processed. SRNL recently received supernate samples retrieved from Tank 10H as well as in-tank batch contact samples for characterization in support of qualifying Batch 1 for processing through the TCCR 1A unit.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Characterization of Tank 9H Dissolution Batches in Support of Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A Batch 1 Preparations

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently preparing the first batch of material to be processed through the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A system. The feed for TCCR 1A will consist of dissolved saltcake from Tank 9H. Two batches of salt (Batch 1A and Batch 1B) have been dissolved in Tank 9H and subsequently transferred to Tank 10H to prepare Batch 1 for TCCR 1A. Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) received samples from each batch of dissolved salt prior to transfer for characterization. SRNL received both a surface and a variable depth sample from Batches 1A and 1B. In both cases no solids were observed in the surface sample, but were observed in the depth sample. For Batch 1A the variable depth sample was only slightly cloudy, while for Batch 1B the variable depth sample contained a significant amount (10.14 wt%) of solids. The solids were determined to be primarily aluminum containing phases, with only a small fraction (0.22 wt%) being sludge solids. In general, the samples from Batch 1A were more concentrated salt solutions than Batch 1B, with sodium concentrations of 8.53 and 8.57 M for the surface and filtered depth samples in Batch 1A, respectively. The sodium concentrations in Batch 1B samples ranged from 4.27 M for the surface sample to 7.57 M for the depth sample filtrate, indicating some stratification within the tank. The 137 Cs activity as well as the total Cs concentration in the filtered Batch 1A depth sample were approximately double the activity and concentration measured in the filtrate from the Batch 1B depth sample. The total Cs concentration in the Batch 1A depth sample filtrate was 22.4 mg/L, while for the Batch 1B depth sample filtrate the total Cs concentration was calculated to be 12.0 mg/L. These Cs concentrations are significantly higher than was measured in Batches 1-3 from Tank 10H dissolved saltcake which was previously processed through the original TCCR unit.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Analysis and Testing of Parsons NGS Solvent Formulation

Three drums containing solvent used during the Next Generation Solvent Test (NGST) conducted by Parsons in 2014-2015 were received at SRNL. After homogenization, samples from each drum were removed, and a composite sample prepared. This composite was analyzed to determine current SRNL characterization method efficacy, and to determine if the 1,3-dicyclohexyl-2- (isotridecyl) guanidine (DCiTG) suppressor could be selectively removed. The results of this work indicate that the titration analytical method currently employed at SRNL is effective at quantitating the DCiTG. The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) method at SRNL can detect the DCiTG, as well its amine and urea decomposition products. However, further development work will be required to allow the 1 H NMR method to quantitate these species. A series of three washing tests were performed on composite samples of the solvent. The results show that up to 67% of the DCiTG was removed from the solvent by simple washing, at multiple ratios of solvent: aqueous phase. This may indicate that a simple pathway exists to wash out the DCiTG and reclaim the solvent (~150 gallons) for future use at the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Evaluation of a Combined Raffinate Waste Stream for Mo-99 Production

Niowave, Inc., based in Lansing, Michigan, intends to produce Mo-99 from the fission of low enriched uranium (LEU) targets. In FY20, SRNL was tasked to provide technical assistance in identifying the primary waste raffinate present in Niowave’s commercial scale system and evaluating methods for disposal. Due to limited information on Niowave’s complete flowsheet and isotope recovery plans, a combined raffinate stream including the entire radionuclide inventory from the irradiated fuel was used for this evaluation. Results of the evaluation indicated the majority of the waste generated can be expected to be Class A; however radioisotopes such as Pu-239, Cs-137, Sr-90, and some of the shorter lived (< 5 year half-life) may challenge Niowave’s ability to meet the waste acceptance criteria for land burial. With appropriate waste management strategies, it is probable that Niowave’s waste could meet Class C requirements for all constituents, with the possible exception of Pu-239. More detailed information of Niowave’s processes are needed to form a more accurate understanding required to execute and effective, economic, and feasible waste management strategy.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Summary of Analytical Results from Samples Supporting Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) Batch 3 and Modeling Results for Cs Loading on CST

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. As part of that process, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) receives and analyzes samples in support of the qualification of each batch to be processed. SRNL recently received supernate samples retrieved from Tank 10H as well as in-tank batch contact samples for characterization in support of qualifying Batch 3 for processing through the TCCR unit. Some results from analysis of those samples have been previously reported. This report documents the remaining analyses of the in-tank batch contact samples as well as the results of ZAM (Zheng, Anthony, Miller) isotherm modeling performed for comparison to the measured results. Results of the additional analyses include analysis of the loading of other radionuclides besides 137 Cs on the crystalline silicotitanate (CST) contained within the in-tank batch contact test samples. Results from those analyses revealed the next highest contributor to the activity on the CST was 90 Sr with an average loading of 2.76E+08 dpm/g CST compared to 3.56E+10 dpm/g CST for the 137Cs. Isotopes of plutonium were also detected on the samples. ZAM modeling was performed using the measured composition of the Tank 10H Batch 3 qualification samples. The modeling predicted a maximum Cs loading approximately 2.2x higher than the measured result. This is a slightly lower ratio (expected/measured) compared to what was observed for the prior TCCR in-tank batch contact testing performed for Batches 1A and 2 where the ZAM results were 2.7-2.8x higher than the measured values.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Cesium Removal Performance Comparisons of Crystalline Silicotitanate Media Batches with Savannah River Site Waste Simulant

The Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) system uses ion exchange columns filled with Crystalline Silicotitanate (CST) media to process radioactive waste solutions for the removal of Cs- 137. The TCCR project is currently focused on dissolving Savannah River Site (SRS) Tank 10H waste (primarily sodium salt cake solids) within the tank followed by at-tank ion exchange column treatment. Plans are underway to prepare and install a second TCCR unit at SRS. Capacity and particle size differences exist between archived (IE-911) and more recently prepared CST media batches (9120-B and 9140-B). Side-by-side comparison testing was performed to evaluate the cesium removal performance of each batch to aid in selecting the preferred CST batch and media characteristics to load into the second TCCR unit. Batch contact equilibrium and flow-through column tests have been conducted with three CST batches using an SRS Average Simulant.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Preliminary Determination of the Impact of Alkaline Earth Metals on Crystalline Silicotitanate

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) recently deployed the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) system which utilizes an ion exchange process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate. In TCCR, salt solution is filtered and then passed through ion exchange columns containing crystalline silicotitanate (CST) media, commercially known as UOP IONSIV™ R9120-B, which is highly selective for removing cesium. The current process focuses on dissolving salt in Savannah River Site (SRS) Tank 10H, followed by processing in the TCCR skid located near the tank. Prior to processing each batch of waste generated in Tank 10H, the projected maximum cesium loading on the CST is determined using an in-tank batch contact equilibrium test. This involves placing a small amount (~0.1 g) of CST in a “teabag” device and submerging it in the tank waste for a period of 10 days. Results from those earlier teabag tests had indicated much lower cesium loading than predicted by the equilibrium sorption model (ZAM). There are numerous possible explanations for this result; however, based on the observed loadings of Ca (and other metals) on the CST from the teabag tests, it was hypothesized that competition from these other ions may be limiting the cesium loadings.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗