Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Thomas K. West IV

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas K. West IV.

Multifidelity Uncertainty Quantification of a Commercial Supersonic Transport

The objective of this work was to develop a multifidelity uncertainty quantification approach for efficient analysis of a commercial supersonic transport concept. An approach based on point-collocation, non-intrusive polynomial chaos was formulated in which a low-fidelity model could be corrected using multiple higher-fidelity models. The formulation and methodology also allows for the addition of uncertainty sources not present in the lower fidelity models. To demonstrate the applicability and potential computational savings of the multifidelity polynomial chaos approach, two model problems were explored. The first was a supersonic airfoil with three levels of modeling fidelity, each capturing a gradual increase in modeling of the underlying flow physics. As much as 50% computational cost reduction was observed using the mutlifidelity approach, while predicting nearly the same amount of uncertainty in drag. The second problem was a commercial supersonic transport. This model had three levels of fidelity that included two different modeling approaches and the addition of physics between the fidelity levels. Results of this analysis yielded nearly a 70% computational savings to predict a comparable amount of uncertainty in ground noise. Both problems illustrate the applicability and significant computational savings of the multifidelity method for efficient and accurate uncertainty quantification.

Thomas K. West IV↗

Examination of Mars2020 Shock-Layer Conditions Via Infrared Emission Spectroscopy of CO2

A new test series was performed in the Electric Arc Shock Tube (EAST) facility, with the aim of reproducing flight conditions encountered during the Mars2020 mission entry into Mars atmosphere. For this test series, the EAST facility was instrumented with two spectrometers for Optical Emission Spectroscopy (OES) measurements and three mid-infrared lasers for Tunable Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopy (TDLAS). This study focuses on the spectrally and spatially resolved radiance measured with OES. Comparison with CEA/NEQAIR and DPLR/NEQAIR simulations were made. For velocity above 2.7 km/s, measurements are found to lie between the different tested kinetic models, within ± 10%. Below 2.7 km/s, the chemistry appears to be frozen and measured radiance profiles are typically 10% above CEA predictions. This difference is explained by shock deceleration effects. Finally, comparison between OES and TDLAS data are made and show a good agreement on the measured temperature and CO2 number density profiles using the two diagnostics, typically within 10 and 5%, respectively.

Augustin Tibère-Inglesse↗

CFD Validation Study of a Hypersonic Cone-Slice-Flap Variable Geometry Configuration

Model validation is the process of determining the degree of accuracy between physical reality and the model. The result of model validation can either be used to improve the model through calibration or quantify the model-form uncertainty. This work focuses on providing the model-form uncertainty through an area metric for a hypersonic cone-slice-flap variable geometry configuration given uncertainty in both the simulation and experimental data. The research here compares two different turbulence models for the simulations. For a variable geometry, performing uncertainty quantification to capture the model-form uncertainty on every configuration is computationally challenging. This work lays out a procedure that can give an accurate representation of the model-form uncertainty using a small number of high-fidelity runs and many low-fidelity runs on multiple configurations. Running this comparison provides a quantifiable measurement for the accuracy of each turbulence model for this type of design. The high-fidelity CFD solver used was VULCAN-CFD and the low-fidelity results came from Cart3D. The experimental data came from the 20-Inch Mach 6 Tunnel located at NASA Langley Research Center. The present work showed that the using both the Spalart and Allamaras and Menter Shear-Stress Transport turbulence models overpredicted the drag and lift coefficient, while underpredicting the pitching moment coefficient. The model-form uncertainty estimate resulted in up to a 13.6% change in the total uncertainty for the drag coefficient, up to a 57.4% change in total uncertainty for the lift coefficient, and up to a 100% change in total uncertainty for the pitching moment coefficient.

Laura M. White↗