The current progress of tandem chemical and biological plastic upcycling
Not Available
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Tian, Yuxin.
Not Available
Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) waste is of low degradability in nature, and its mismanagement threatens numerous ecosystems. To combat the accumulation of waste PET in the biosphere, PET bio-upcycling, which integrates chemical pretreatment to produce PET-derived monomers with their microbial conversion into value-added products, has shown promise. The recently discovered Rhodococcus jostii strain PET (RPET) can metabolically degrade terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG) as sole carbon sources, and it has been developed into a microbial chassis for PET upcycling. However, the scarcity of synthetic biology tools, specifically designed for the non-model microbe RPET, limits the development of a microbial cell factory for expanding the repertoire of bioproducts from post-consumer PET. Herein, we describe the development of potent genetic tools for RPET, including (1) two inducible and titratable expression systems for tunable gene expression and (2) Serine Integrase-based Recombinational Tools (SIRT) for genome editing. Using these tools, we systematically engineer the RPET strain to ultimately establish microbial supply chains for producing multiple chemicals, including lycopene, lipids, and succinate, from post-consumer PET waste bottles, achieving the highest titer of lycopene ever reported thus far in RPET (i.e., 22.6 mg/L of lycopene, approximately 10,000-fold higher than that of the wild-type strain). Furthermore, this work highlights the great potential of plastic upcycling as a generalizable means of sustainable production of diverse chemicals.
Not Available
Studies on domain adaptation (DA) for remote sensing (RS) imagery analysis lack consistency in selection and description of evaluation scenarios. Without properly characterizing datasets, model assumptions, and evaluation scenarios, it is difficult to objectively compare DA methods and reach conclusions about their suitability across different applications. With this motivation, this work seeks to empirically assess to which extent the interaction between data characteristics and model assumptions influences the effectiveness of DA methods. Using the widely explored task of building footprint segmentation as a case study, we perform a large-scale study across over 200 DA scenarios that include variations across view angles, areas observed, and sensors used for data acquisition. Rather than adopting different model architectures or optimization criteria, we contrast the performances of two DA methods based on adversarial learning that differ only in their assumptions about source and target domains. Informed by metadata and data characteristics unveiled using traditional computer vision (CV) techniques as well as pretrained deep models, we provide a detailed meta-analysis of experiments highlighting the importance of accurately considering data assumptions for DA in RS segmentation tasks. As demonstrated by a “cherry-picking” exercise, different claims regarding which model is best could be made by selecting different subsets of evaluation scenarios. While well-calibrated assumptions can be beneficial, mismatching assumptions can lead to negative biases in DA applications. Furthermore, this study intends to motivate the community toward more consistent evaluation protocols while providing recommendations and insights toward creating novel benchmark datasets, documenting data characteristics, application-specific knowledge, and model assumptions.