Capturing & Analyzing Requirements with FRET
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Requirements, Simulink models, Verification↗
Engineering topics
Tom Pressburger
Publications and source records attributed to Tom Pressburger.
Bridging the Gap Between Requirements and Simulink Model Analysis
Formal veri fication and simulation are powerful tools for the veri fication of requirements against complex systems. Requirements are developed in early stages of the software lifecycle and are typically expressed in natural language. There is a gap between such requirements and their software implementations. We present a framework that bridges this gap by supporting a tight integration and feedback loop between high-level requirements and their analysis against software artifacts. Our framework implements an analysis portal within the fret requirements elicitation tool, thus forming an end-to-end, open-source environment where requirements are written in an intuitive, structured natural language, and are veri fied automatically against Simulink models.
FRET↗
FRET Tutorial
In this tutorial, we present the FRET tool for writing, understanding, formalizing and analyzing requirements. In practice, requirements are typically written in natural language, which is ambiguous and consequently not amenable to formal analysis. Since formal, mathematical notations are unintuitive, requirements in FRET are entered in a restricted, natural language, called FRETish with precise unambiguous meaning. This tutorial explains how requirements can be captured in FRETish and subsequently formalized in temporal logics and in the synchronous data flow language Lustre. We show, through multiple examples, how FRET assists users in understanding FRETish requirements and clarifying subtle semantic issues through English and diagrammatic explanations as well as interactive simulation. FInally, this tutorial describes how FRET can be used to perform realizability checking for identifying conflicting requirements and the connection of FRET with (1) the CoCoSim automated analysis tool for the verification of Simulink and Stateflow models, and (2) the Copilot runtime monitoring tool for the analysis of C programs.
FRET↗
Monitoring ROS2: From Requirements to Autonomous Robots
Context/Goals - Capture mission requirements in high-level language. - Monitor requirements for robots. At a Glance - Transform requirements into runtime monitors for ROS2: - Requirements elicitation.* - Transform requirements into Temporal Logic formulas.* - Transform Temporal Logic formulas into runtime monitors.* - Generate hard real-time code for monitors.* - Generate ROS2 application directly from requirements.+ *Steps done in prior work. +Steps extended from prior work.
Runtime verification↗
Authoring, Analyzing, and Monitoring Requirements for a Lift-Plus-Cruise Aircraft
Requirements specification and analysis is widely applied to ensure the correctness of industrial systems in safety critical domains. Requirements are often initially written in natural language, which is highly ambiguous, and as a second step transformed into a language with rigorous semantics for formal analysis. In this paper, we report on our experience in requirements creation and analysis, as well as run-time monitor generation using the Formal Requirement Elicitation Tool (FRET), on an industrial case study for a Lift-Plus-Cruise concept aircraft. We study the creation of requirements directly in the structured language of FRET without a prior definition of the same requirements in natural language. We focus on requirements describing state machines and discuss the challenges that we faced, in terms of creating requirements and generating monitors. We demonstrate how realizability, i.e., checking whether a requirements specification can be implemented, is crucial for understanding temporal interdependencies among requirements. Our study is the first complete attempt at using FRET to create industrial, realizable requirements and generate run-time monitors. Insight from lessons learned was materialized into new features in the FRET and JKind analysis frameworks.
Requirements engineering↗