Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Toraman, Hilal Ezgi

Publications and source records attributed to Toraman, Hilal Ezgi.

Effect of pyrolysis operating conditions on the catalytic co‐pyrolysis of low‐density polyethylene and polyethylene terephthalate with zeolite catalysts

Abstract In this study, the catalytic (co‐)pyrolysis of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) with HZSM‐5 and HY zeolite catalysts was conducted in a micro‐pyrolysis reactor coupled to a two‐dimensional gas chromatography system. Pyrolysis operating conditions, such as the pyrolysis temperature, the catalyst to feedstock (CF) ratio, and the LDPE:PET ratio, were varied. It was found that for the co‐pyrolysis of LDPE and PET, HZSM‐5 led to higher yields of C2‐C4 olefins and monoaromatic products. Lower CF ratios increased the yield of C2‐C4 olefins for LDPE pyrolysis, but decreased benzene yield for PET pyrolysis, concomitant with an increased yield in benzoic acid. A lower temperature of 400°C which was sufficient for the pyrolysis of LDPE, led to incomplete conversion of PET. Surface response diagrams were used to visualize the impact of the various pyrolysis operating conditions on the yield of C2‐C4 olefins and BTEX, which serve as target products for the circular economy.

Okonsky, Sean Timothy↗

Insights into co-pyrolysis of polyethylene terephthalate and polyamide 6 mixture through experiments, kinetic modeling and machine learning

The non-isothermal pyrolysis of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyamide 6 (PA6), and their mixtures was studied in a thermogravimetric analyzer at different heating rates. Temperature of maximum decomposition (T max ) decreased by 25–45 °C and 35–55 °C for the PET:PA6 mixtures (3:1, 1:1, 1:3) compared to PET and PA6, respectively. The kinetic analysis was initially carried out using isoconversional method. However, the dependency of activation energy on conversion was observed for the co-pyrolysis of PET and PA6 that suggested the occurrence of multi-step reactions in the mixtures. Distributed activation energy model (DAEM) was used in this study to describe the multistep reactions occurring during pyrolysis of PET:PA6 mixtures. Here, in this work, a four-parallel reaction DAEM was developed to describe the pyrolysis kinetics of PET:PA6 mixtures. The apparent mean activation energies (E o ) for PET, PA6, and mixtures varied in the range of 244–255, 140–215, and 138–255 kJ mol –1 , respectively. The mass loss profiles of PET and PA6 mixtures were also modeled using artificial neural network (ANN). Out of 155 ANN models, the best prediction was made by ANN511 with R 2 greater than 0.997 for both test and unseen data. The interaction effects observed through TGA experiments and subsequent kinetic analysis were further assessed in terms of product composition using analytical pyrolysis coupled with gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer (Py-GC/MS). Co-pyrolysis of PET and PA6 resulted in the formation of new aromatic compounds with nitrogen-containing functional groups, which were not detected when PET or PA6 were pyrolyzed individually.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Catalytic co-pyrolysis of LDPE and PET with HZSM-5, H-beta, and HY: experiments and kinetic modelling

In this study, the catalytic pyrolysis of low-density polyethylene (LDPE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and their mixture (1 : 1 wt/wt) with three zeolite catalysts (HZSM-5, H-beta, HY) was investigated using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) and a Pyroprobe® micro-reactor coupled to a gas chromatograph mass spectrometer (Py-GC/MS). The TGA results demonstrated that during pyrolysis at 10 °C min –1 , on average, zeolite catalysts decreased the maximum decomposition temperature by 149 °C for LDPE while only decreasing by 8 °C for PET. The derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) curve evidenced interactions when the two polymers were catalytically co-pyrolyzed for all the three catalysts. A lumped nth order reaction scheme was able to accurately model both non-catalytic and catalytic pyrolysis and co-pyrolysis by using the least squares fitting approach for determining the kinetic parameters. The kinetic model was able to model well the interaction effects observed during catalytic co-pyrolysis of LDPE and PET with HZSM-5, H-beta, and HY (Fit% Wt% > 96%, Fit% DTG > 94%). Py-GC/MS experiments for the catalytic fast pyrolysis of LDPE revealed that HZSM-5 resulted in the highest selectivity to aromatic hydrocarbons (31.6%) and HY resulted in the highest selectivity to gasoline range C 5 –C 10 paraffins and olefins (40.9%). Catalytic fast pyrolysis of PET showed high selectivity to benzene for all the catalysts (>43%) and that HZSM-5 resulted in the highest selectivity to polyaromatic hydrocarbons (24.7%). Finally, the catalytic fast co-pyrolysis of LDPE and PET revealed interaction effects for all the three catalysts evidenced by a positive synergy% for alkylated benzenes (3–142%) and polyaromatics (105–187%) with a concomitant negative synergy% for benzene (24–36%) and C 5 –C 10 paraffins and olefins (27–53%).

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Programmable heating and quenching for efficient thermochemical synthesis

Conventional thermochemical syntheses by continuous heating under near-equilibrium conditions face critical challenges in improving the synthesis rate, selectivity, catalyst stability and energy efficiency, owing to the lack of temporal control over the reaction temperature and time, and thus the reaction pathways. As an alternative, we present a non-equilibrium, continuous synthesis technique that uses pulsed heating and quenching (for example, 0.02 s on, 1.08 s off) using a programmable electric current to rapidly switch the reaction between high (for example, up to 2,400 K) and low temperatures. The rapid quenching ensures high selectivity and good catalyst stability, as well as lowers the average temperature to reduce the energy cost. Using CH4 pyrolysis as a model reaction, our programmable heating and quenching technique leads to high selectivity to value-added C2 products (>75% versus <35% by the conventional non-catalytic method and versus <60% by most conventional methods using optimized catalysts). Our technique can be extended to a range of thermochemical reactions, such as NH 3 synthesis, for which we achieve a stable and high synthesis rate of about 6,000 μmol g Fe –1 h –1 at ambient pressure for >100 h using a non-optimized catalyst. Furthermore, this study establishes a new model towards highly efficient non-equilibrium thermochemical synthesis.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗