Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Trublowski, John

Publications and source records attributed to Trublowski, John.

Heat sink for luminaire and luminaire arrangements having a heat sink

A heat sink for a luminaire includes a central portion having a top surface and a bottom surface. The bottom surface is adapted to receive a lighting arrangement. The heat sink further includes a plurality of arms configured to dissipate heat generated by the lighting arrangement. The plurality of arms extend radially outward from the central portion. Each one of the plurality of arms is substantially arcuate between a proximal end and a distal end.

Trublowski, John↗

Additively Manufactured Solid-State Luminaire

This project addresses several key barriers to wide-spread adoption of additive manufacturing (AM) technology as applied to solid state lighting luminaires. The solution will utilize cutting edge AM approaches for integrating structure with thermal management solutions, electronic functionality, and optics. The research team (Eaton, Lighting Research Center (LRC) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Xerox Research Centre of Canada (XRCC)) utilize their AM and lighting expertise to investigate breakthrough manufacturing approaches that will significantly reduce cost, eliminate manufacturing process waste, and improve luminaire efficacy. The team has identified critical areas of research and proposed novel technical approaches to achieve these goals. Key areas of focus in Budget Period 1 (BP1) of the project quantified the impact of applying AM methodologies to the main, discrete subsystem components (Heat Sink, Housing, Optics, Electronics). Budget Period 2 (BP2) research explored similar impact on a fully integrated, AM modular luminaire concept. Final Achievement of the Target Metrics for the project are as follows: Material Reduction: achieved > 57.45% (target is 50%) Manufacturing Process: achieved > 51% reduction (target is 50%) Application Efficacy: achieved 126 lm/W (target is 130 lm/W) First Cost vs Baseline: demonstrated 49% improvement in project timing, 59% improvement in man hour savings and 89% worse BOM costs (due to deficiencies in current “state of the art” equipment). The BOM costs improve to 53% savings if state of the art processes and equipment could have been used.

3D Printing↗