Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Tscherning, C. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Tscherning, C. C..

The inverse gravimetric problem in gravity modelling

One of the main purposes of geodesy is to determine the gravity field of the Earth in the space outside its physical surface. This purpose can be pursued without any particular knowledge of the internal density even if the exact shape of the physical surface of the Earth is not known, though this seems to entangle the two domains, as it was in the old Stoke's theory before the appearance of Molodensky's approach. Nevertheless, even when large, dense and homogeneous data sets are available, it was always recognized that subtracting from the gravity field the effect of the outer layer of the masses (topographic effect) yields a much smoother field. This is obviously more important when a sparse data set is bad so that any smoothing of the gravity field helps in interpolating between the data without raising the modeling error, this approach is generally followed because it has become very cheap in terms of computing time since the appearance of spectral techniques. The mathematical description of the Inverse Gravimetric Problem (IGP) is dominated mainly by two principles, which in loose terms can be formulated as follows: the knowledge of the external gravity field determines mainly the lateral variations of the density; and the deeper the density anomaly giving rise to a gravity anomaly, the more improperly posed is the problem of recovering the former from the latter. The statistical relation between rho and n (and its inverse) is also investigated in its general form, proving that degree cross-covariances have to be introduced to describe the behavior of rho. The problem of the simultaneous estimate of a spherical anomalous potential and of the external, topographic masses is addressed criticizing the choice of the mixed collection approach.

Sanso, F.↗

The precise computation of geoid undulation differences with comparison to results obtained from the global positioning system

Ellipsoidal height differences have been determined for 13 station pairs in the central Ohio region using measurements made with the Global Positioning System. This information was used to compute geoid undulation differences based on known orthometric heights. These differences were compared to gravimetrically-computed undulations (using a Stokes integration procedure, and least squares collocation having an internal r.m.s. agreement of plus or minus 1 cm in undulation differences). The two sets of undulation differences have an r.m.s. discrepancy of plus or minus 5 cm while the average station separation is of the order of 14 km. This good agreement suggests that gravimetric data can be used to compute accurate geoid undulation differences that can be used to convert ellipsoidal height differences obtained from GPS to orthometric height differences.

Engelis, T.↗