Engineering topics

Tsyganenko, Nikolai A.

Publications and source records attributed to Tsyganenko, Nikolai A..

3 records

NASA NTRS1994

Magnetotail views at 33R(sub E): IMP 8 magnetometer observations

This paper presents magnetic field vector (B) maps, electric current vector (curl B) maps, magnetic force (JxB) contour maps, and total field contour maps covering the full tail cross section in the yz plane. The maps are based on 16 years of 5-min averages of Interplanetary Monitoring Platform (IMP) 8 magnetic field data. During this time, IMP 8 traversed the tail between -25R(sub E) and -40R(sub E) in the x direction. Its average x distance was -33R(sub E). For this average distance we show separate maps for low and high dipole tilts, corresponding to equinox and northern hemisphere summer seasons. The low-tilt (equinox) maps show symmetrical field and current patterns; the high-tilt (solstice) maps show the cross-tail current sheet arcing above the equatorial diagonal in the center and dipping below it on the flanks. The shape of warped current sheet fits Fairfield's (1980) displaced ellipse model fairly well. The distance at which the current sheet is hinged to the magnetic equator is found to be 9.88R(sub E) and is independent of Kp. The z profile of current density shows a central peak, 3R(sub E) full width at half maximum, and smaller, flanking shoulders. A Harris sheet profile with a 7R(sub E) thickness fits the B(sub x) profile. Though these are magnetic field data, the JxB maps clearly outline the plasma sheet. This approach also gives 7R(sub E) thickness. Many of the average field and current features inferred and demonstrated in earlier studies are confirmed here; some of them are seen for the first time in full cross-section view. Among new features revealed are a large current vortex in the winter hemisphere lobe, a dawn-dusk asymmetry in the JxB force in the plasma sheet (it is stronger on the duskside), and a separation of the cross-tail current sheet into core and wing parts.

Kaymaz, Zerefsan↗

NASA NTRS1993

Birkeland currents in the plasma sheet

A search was conducted for the signatures of Birkeland currents in the Earth's magnetic tail, using observed values of B(sub x) and B(sub y) from large sets of spacecraft data. The data were binned by x and y for -10 greater than x(sub GSM) greater than -35 and absolute value of y(sub GSM) less than or equal to 20 R(sub E) (less than or equal to 30 R(sub E) for x(sub GSM) less than or equal to -25 R(sub E)) and in each bin their distribution in the (B(sub x), B(sub y)) plane was fitted by least squares to a piecewise linear function. That gave average x-y distributions of the flaring angle between B(sub xy) and the x direction, as well as that angle's variation across the thickness of the plasma sheet. Angles obtained in the central plasma sheet differed from those derived near the lobe boundary. That is the expected signature if earthward or tailward Birkeland current sheets are embedded in the plasma sheet, and from this dfiference we derived the dawn-dusk profiles of the tail Birkeland currents for several x(sub GSM) intervals. It was found that (1) the Birkeland currents have the sense of region 1 currents, when mapped to the ionosphere; (2) both the linear current density (kiloamperes/R(sub E)) and the net magnitude of the field-aligned currents decrease rapidly down the tail; (3) the total Birkeland current at x approximately equals -10 R(sub E) equals approximately equals 500-700 kA, which is approx. 30% of the net region 1 current observed at ionospheric altitudes, in agreement with model mapping results; and (4) the B(sub z) and B(sub y) components of the interplanetary magnetic field influence the distribution of Birkeland currents in the tail.

Tsyganenko, Nikolai A.↗

NASA NTRS1992

Uses and limitations of the Tsyganenko magnetic field models

The Tsyganenko models contain 'modules' for two external current systems, the tail and ring currents; the former is the more detailed. No specific modules, however, cover the magnetopause and the Birkeland current system. The effects of these currents are represented by an all-purpose 'polynomial', and the resulting formulas involve about 30 parameters that specify the model. The dependence on magnetospheric indices is also simplified.

Stern, David P.↗