Search NASASearch

Engineering topics

Tucker, Garritt J.

Publications and source records attributed to Tucker, Garritt J..

Feature engineering descriptors, transforms, and machine learning for grain boundaries and variable-sized atom clusters

Abstract Obtaining microscopic structure-property relationships for grain boundaries is challenging due to their complex atomic structures. Recent efforts use machine learning to derive these relationships, but the way the atomic grain boundary structure is represented can have a significant impact on the predictions. Key steps for property prediction common to grain boundaries and other variable-sized atom clustered structures include: (1) describing the atomic structure as a feature matrix, (2) transforming the variable-sized feature matrix to a fixed length common to all structures, and (3) applying a machine learning algorithm to predict properties from the transformed matrices. We examine how these steps and different combinations of engineered features impact the accuracy of grain boundary energy predictions using a database of over 7000 grain boundaries. Additionally, we assess how different engineered features support interpretability, offering insights into the physics of the structure-property relationships.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE

Synthesis, microstructure and micro-mechanical characterization of metal (Nb, Ti) – MAX phase (Ti 2 AlC) nanolaminates

We utilize elevated temperature physical vapor deposition (PVD) techniques to design metal/MAX multilayered nanocomposite thin films with alternating nanoscale metallic (Nb, Ti) and MAX phase (Ti 2 AlC) layer thicknesses. These metal/MAX nanolaminate architectures attempt to exploit a unique hierarchical topology – as interfaces between the layers are expected to be in direct competition with the internal interfaces within the MAX layers, to drive their tunable macroscopic mechanical behavior. Two metal/MAX nanolaminates – Nb/Ti 2 AlC and Ti/Ti 2 AlC – were deposited. The Nb/Ti 2 AlC metal/MAX system showed highly diffused layer interfaces with distinct Ti – rich and Nb–Al – rich layers, with the presence of MAX phase alongside TiC and other Ti–Al and Nb–Al intermetallic phases. The Nb/Ti 2 AlC system possessed a layered architecture, though the MAX phases were not found to be continuously present in each alternating layer. The second Ti/Ti 2 AlC system showed a non-lamellar nanocomposite microstructure and the formation of mixed Ti n+1 AlC n phases (a mix of n = 1, 2), and no indication of layering. Diffusion occurring between the metal/MAX layers in both cases, likely due to the elevated temperatures during the deposition process, is speculated as the likely cause of these resultant microstructures. The mechanical properties of both systems were evaluated using micromechanical (nanoindentation and micro-pillar compression) techniques, which demonstrated high strengths for both systems (Nb system: yield and instability strengths of 4.88 ± 0.1 GPa and 5.57 ± 0.03 GPa, Ti system: yield and instability strength of 5.61 ± 0.28 GPa and 6.21 ± 0.25 GPa). In conclusion, this work highlights the promising mechanical properties of metal/MAX multilayered depositions and summarizes the challenges in PVD synthesis of metal/MAX multilayered nanolaminates.

MAX phase