Uribe, Eva C. | Search NASA

DOE OSTI2022

Real-Time Inventory Change Detection for the Protactinium Decay Inventory of the Molten Salt Breeder Reactor

This work presents a novel monitoring method for detecting material loss from the decay inventory of the molten salt breeder reactor (MSBR) by monitoring for changes to the system dynamics using an isotopic ratio. Here the isotopic masses in the decay inventory of a MSBR were simulated under several material loss scenarios. In each case, the ratio of 231 Pa to 233 Pa served as a sensitive and lasting indicator of material loss. This isotope ratio quickly decreased outside the normal range after a material loss, and the ratio remained depressed for several years after the loss. The dynamics of this ratio were driven by the periodic batch discard from the decay inventory every 220 days, which was specified in the MSBR design to periodically remove fission product buildup. For this method, isotopic ratios were found to be rapid and enduring indicators of inventory change if they comprise a pair with a short half-life (e.g., 233 Pa) and a long half-life (e.g., 231 Pa) relative to the effective half-life induced by the driving system process (e.g., the batch discard cycle). Using such an isotope pair enabled a method to monitor for changes to the effective half-life of the system and by extension changes to the system inputs and outputs.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Tailored Cyber Strategies for the 21st Century (Summary Report)

On December 9, 2020, Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) convened a diverse set of voices from across the federal government, the United States (U.S.) military, the private sector, and national laboratories to understand current and future trends affecting our national cyber strategy, and to illuminate the role of Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) in contributing to national cyber strategy objectives.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

DOE OSTI2020

Why does cyber deterrence fail and when might it succeed? A framework for cyber scenario analysis

Through cyberattacks on information technology and digital communications systems, antagonists have increasingly been able to alter the strategic balance in their favor without provoking serious consequences. Conflict within and through the cyber domain is inherently different from conflict in other domains that house our critical systems. These differences result in new challenges for defending and creating resilient systems, and for deterring those who would wish to disrupt or destroy them. The purpose of this paper is to further examine the question of whether or not deterrence can be an effective strategy in cyber conflict, given our broad and varied interests in cyberspace. We define deterrence broadly as the creation of conditions that dissuade antagonists from taking unwanted actions because they believe that they will incur unacceptably high costs and/or receive insufficient benefits from taking that action. Deterrence may or may not be the most credible or effective strategy for achieving our desired end states in cybersecurity. Regardless of the answer here, however, it is important to consider why deterrence strategies might succeed under certain conditions, and to understand why deterrence is not effective within the myriad contexts that it appears fail. Deterrence remains a key component of U.S. cyber strategy, but there is little detail on how to operationalize or implement this policy, how to bring a whole-of-government and whole-of- private-sector approach to cyber deterrence, which types of antagonists can or should be deterred, and in which contexts. Moreover, discussion about how nations can and should respond to significant cyber incidents largely centers around whether or not the incident constitutes a "use of force," which would justify certain types of responses according to international law. However, we believe the "use of force" threshold is inadequate to describe the myriad interests and objectives of actors in cyberspace, both attackers and defenders. In this paper, we propose an approach to further examine if deterrence is an effective strategy and under which conditions. Our approach includes systematic analysis of cyber incident scenarios using a framework to evaluate the effectiveness of various activities in influencing antagonist behavior. While we only examine a single scenario for this paper, we propose that additional work is needed to more fully understand how various alternative thresholds constrain or unleash options for actors to influence one another's behavior in the cyber domain.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗