Urso, Justin [University of Central Florida]

DOE OSTI2025

Autoignition Delay Time Measurements of Dimethyl Ether at 110 Bar Inside a Shock Tube

Fuel mixtures of propane and dimethyl ether have been proposed as potential diesel substitutes for use in compression-ignition engines. There is an interest in phasing out diesel fuel because its combustion byproducts are harmful to the environment. Propane and dimethyl ether burn cleaner and produce significantly less carbon dioxide than diesel. The combustion of these fuels at engine-relevant conditions must be characterized to create an engine capable of running on propane and dimethyl ether. In this work, IDT measurements of stoichiometric neat DME diluted in 75% argon were completed for temperatures spanning 800-1200K at 110 bar. A shock tube will be used for all experiments in this work. Experimental IDTs were then compared to simulated values using several well-established mechanisms in the literature.

Guenther, Aaron C. [University of Central Florida]↗

DOE OSTI2025

DME-Propane Blends Ignition Experiments and Modeling for Heavy-Duty Mixing Controlled Compression Engines

A blend of dimethyl ether (DME) and propane (C3H8) is being studied in a shock tube at heavy-duty engine conditions at 110 bar. Due to its intrinsic combustion properties, DME/propane blend can potentially replace diesel in mixing controlled compression ignition engines. A blend of DME/propane can reduce emissions in mixing controlled compression ignition in heavy-duty engines through modifications, which require simulations using a high-fidelity chemical kinetics model that can accurately predict the chemistry of the blend. An essential aspect of testing the chemical kinetics model is doing baseline fundamental chemistry studies on neat DME and propane, which include ignition delay time measurements. In this work, using a high-pressure shock tube, ignition delay times were gathered for DME/Propane blends at 110 bar diluted with AR to test chemical kinetic models published in the literature. These models include Aramco 3.0, NUIG V1.1, C3mech V3.3, and Dames et al. Comparisons with the experimental IDTs and models were conducted, and general agreement was observed. A sensitivity analysis was conducted, and important reactions were outlined.

Mohammed, Zuhayr Pasha [University of Central Flor↗