Engineering topics

VanSelst, Mark

Publications and source records attributed to VanSelst, Mark.

9 records

NASA NTRS2002

Dual-Task Interference When A Response is Not Required

When subjects are required to respond to two stimuli presented in rapid succession, responses to the second stimulus are delayed. Such dual-task interference has been attributed to a fundamental processing bottleneck preventing simultaneous processing on both tasks. Two experiments show dual-task interference even when the first task does not require a response. The observed interference is caused by a bottleneck in central cognitive processing, rather than in response initiation or execution.

VanSelst, Mark↗

NASA NTRS1998

Effects of Single-Task Interference on Dual-Task Interference

Van Sergi, Ruthruff and Johnston found that dual-task practice can markedly reduce interference in the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm. Their results are consistent with a bottleneck model in which practice serves primarily to reduce stage durations. This model predicts that single-task practice on Task 1 alone should produce marked reductions in interference, whereas single-task practice on Task 2 should not. New experiments test these predictions. Alternative theoretical accounts are also considered.

Johnson, James C.↗

NASA NTRS1997

Dual-Task Interference Across Practice: Reductions in Task Two Slowing

When subjects attempt to perform two speeded discrimination tasks in in rapid succession, performance on the second discrimination is often strikingly impaired. It susc previously been reported that extended practice yields only a minimal decrease in the amount of Task 2 slowing. In contrast, we found that Task 2 slowing decreases dramatically for all six subjects across 40 sessions of practice. In one experiment we demonstrate that this reduction in interference does not occur when the tasks use the same response modality. Two additional experiments investigating transfer effects demonstrate that dual-task interference remains small when a new (unpracticed) Task 2 is used, but returns to baseline when a new Task 1 is used. We conclude that the main cause of the changes that occur with extended practice is a drastic shortening of bottleneck stages in Task 1.

VanSelst, Mark↗

NASA NTRS1997

Response Modality Modulator PRP Interference, Even When Task 1 is a no-go trial

In a Psychological Refractory Period paradigm where the first task requires one of several possible responses on some trials (the go trials), but no response on other (no-go) trials, response modality modulates the amount of interference on Task 2 processing. This is true even when Task 1 is no-go trial. Differences in the cost of switching response sets between processing for Task 1 and Task 2 may provide an account of this surprising phenomenon.

VanSelst, Mark↗

NASA NTRS1997

Word Effects in Dual-Task Studies Using Lexical Decision and Naming as Task 2

Word frequency effects in dual-task, lexical decision are variously reported to be additive or under-additive across SOA. We replicate and extend earlier lexical decision studies and find word frequency to be additive across SOA. To more directly capture lexical processing, we examine dual-task naming. Once again we find word frequency to be additive across SOA. Lexical processing appears to be constrained by central processing limitations.

Remington, Roger↗

NASA NTRS1997

Practice Drastically Reduces Interference in the Psychological Refractory Period Paradigm

Six subjects were given 36 sessions of practice in a PRP paradigm. Task 1 required vocal responses, while Task 2 required manual responses. Unlike previous experiments with two manual response tasks, practice dramatically reduced the size of the PRP interference, from an initial 353 msec to only 40 msec. Analysis of factor interactions support a central bottleneck model of Task 2 postponement both early and late in practice.

VanSelst, Mark↗

NASA NTRS1997

Using APEX to Model Anticipated Human Error: Analysis of a GPS Navigational Aid

The interface development process can be dramatically improved by predicting design facilitated human error at an early stage in the design process. The approach we advocate is to SIMULATE the behavior of a human agent carrying out tasks with a well-specified user interface, ANALYZE the simulation for instances of human error, and then REFINE the interface or protocol to minimize predicted error. This approach, incorporated into the APEX modeling architecture, differs from past approaches to human simulation in Its emphasis on error rather than e.g. learning rate or speed of response. The APEX model consists of two major components: (1) a powerful action selection component capable of simulating behavior in complex, multiple-task environments; and (2) a resource architecture which constrains cognitive, perceptual, and motor capabilities to within empirically demonstrated limits. The model mimics human errors arising from interactions between limited human resources and elements of the computer interface whose design falls to anticipate those limits. We analyze the design of a hand-held Global Positioning System (GPS) device used for radical and navigational decisions in small yacht recalls. The analysis demonstrates how human system modeling can be an effective design aid, helping to accelerate the process of refining a product (or procedure).

VanSelst, Mark↗

NASA NTRS1997

Word Frequency Effects in Dual-Task Studies Using Lexical Decision and Naming as Task 2

Word frequency effects in dual-task lexical decision are variously reported to be additive or underadditive across SOA. We replicate and extend earlier lexical decision studies and find word frequency to be additive across SOA. To more directly capture lexical processing, we examine dual-task naming. Once again, we find word frequency to be additive across SOA. Lexical processing appears to be constrained by central processing limitations.

Remington, Roger W.↗

NASA NTRS1996

The Role of Response Processing in the Single-Channel PRP Bottleneck

Does the single-channel bottleneck occur in the psychological refractory period paradigm in the absence of overt responses? A go/no-go paradigm was used to vary a default response on all trials, multiple go responses were used. Results show that the bottleneck is still present on trials that do not require a response, but its duration is reduced.

VanSelst, Mark↗