Victoria Hartwick | Search NASA

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The NASA Ames Mars Global Climate Model: Benchmarking Publicly Released Source Code and Model Output

We have recently publicly released source code from the new NASA Ames Mars Global Climate Model (MGCM), which is based on NOAA/GFDL cubed-sphere finite volume (FV3-based) dynamical core (https://github.com/nasa/AmesGCM). We also we have a manuscript in preparation that aims to document the status of the new MGCM, and present selected simulations generated from it with interpretations and comparisons to both observations and the Ames Legacy MGCM. Output from our reference simulation will be made publicly available as well. One of our ongoing goals is to understand the underlying causes for differences between results produced with the new FV3-based dynamical core compared to the Legacy C-grid dynamical core. While the thermal and dynamical fields predicted with the new and Legacy GCMs are broadly similar for much of the year, there are key differences at low resolution when no external drag is applied to the new MGCM. This is particularly clear during a seasonal window of ~100 degrees of Ls surrounding southern summer solstice, when the predicted northern hemisphere polar warming is significantly over-predicted in the new MGCM. When we apply Rayleigh drag throughout much of the tropics and sub-tropics to the new MGCM, the simulated zonal mean structure of the atmosphere is much more consistent with both MCS observations and Legacy MGCM simulations. We note that the Kling et al. (2023; this meeting) study demonstrates that the behavior that we see with Rayleigh drag here can be recovered with high resolution simulations (in the horizontal and in the vertical) or with parameterized orographic and non-orographic gravity waves at lower resolution. While this work is still in progress, our preliminary conclusion is that the new dynamical core is less dissipative than the Legacy dynamical core. At low to moderate resolution, users of the new MGCM will need to be careful to use some sort of external drag, either in the form of gravity wave drag parameterizations or the simpler Rayleigh drag.

Melinda April Kahre↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Cloud Condensation Nuclei in the Early Martian Atmosphere

Explanations for how early Mars supported warmer and wetter conditions 3.5 to 4 billion years ago have long been debated. A water cloud greenhouse has been proposed as a mechanism of warming early Mars, but modeling studies of these environments produce mixed results. Studies show that both H 2 O and CO 2 clouds are capable of influencing atmospheric and surface temperatures, but the amount of warming induced is very sensitive to the cloud physics assumptions made. Producing a strong water cloud greenhouse effect is dependent on forming clouds as high in the atmosphere as possible to maximize warming. However, the majority of studies of H 2 O and CO 2 clouds on early Mars assume that a constant number of seed nuclei are available at all altitudes for clouds to condense onto. Here we test the validity of this assumption in massive CO 2 atmospheres. Explaining how dust is lofted into the middle atmosphere to serve as seed nuclei for cloud formation is a challenge even for present day Mars. This problem may change in an early Mars environment where having a more massive atmosphere could result in differences in the general circulation, vertical transport, and settling time scales of dust. Here, we begin a first-ever study of the early Mars dust cycle and how it might couple to the water cycle. We present early Mars simulations in which dust is injected at the surface and can be transported throughout the atmosphere. We explore the resulting vertical and horizontal distributions of dust particles and their sizes with an emphasis on the maximum height of the dust. We aim to investigate what the distribution of cloud condensation nuclei may have been on early Mars and how this might impact cloud formation.

Kathryn Steakley↗