Search NASASearch

Engineering topics

Vogt, R. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Vogt, R. A..

Thermal Radiation Analyzer System (TRASYS)

Working alone or with SINDA '85/FLUINT, TRASYS solves radiation components of thermal analysis problems. Calculates both internode radiation exchange and incident and absorbed heat rate due to sunlight. Used in satellite design, program handles situations where one surface wholly or partially shades another from direct sunlight.

Vogt, R. A.

Thermal Radiation Analysis System (TRASYS)

Designed for solar heating design, TRASYS handles partial shading of one surface by another, and translucent surfaces. Runs on DEC computer and generates output compatible with SINDA '85/FLUINT.

Vogt, R. A.

Thermal Radiation Analysis System (TRASYS II)

Program solves thermal heating problems such as effect of sunlight on satellite. Surface geometry features include complete shadowing ability, including shadowing by semi-transparent surfaces. Written for DEC VAX.

Vogt, R. A.

Systems Improved Numerical Differencing Analyzer (SINDA)

SINDA '85/FLUINT handles complex problems involving pumps, valves, heat exchangers, and resistor-capacitor networks. When combining SINDA with another classic program, TRASYS II, users tackle thermal radiation problems, including shadowing by opaque or semitransparent surfaces. Utility programs automatically convert SINDA/TRASYS output to form compatible with NASTRAN-developed structures.

Vogt, R. A.

Updated Thermal-Radiation Program

Thermal Radiation Analyzer System, TRASYS II, is computer-software system with generalized capability to solve radiation-related aspects of thermal-analysis problems. Used in conjunction with generalized thermal-analysis program, any thermal problem expressed in terms of lumped-parameter R-C thermal network solved.

Vogt, R. A.

Thermal Radiation Analyzer

Thermal Radiation Analyzer System TRASYS II solves radiation related aspects of thermal analysis problems. TRASYS II provides for calculation of internode radiation interchange data and for calculation of incident and absorbed heat rate data originating from environmental radiant heat sources. When TRASYS II used in conjunction with generalized thermal analysis program such as Systems Improved Numerical Differencing Analyzer (SINDA), any thermal problem expressed in terms of lumped parameter RC thermal network solved.

Vogt, R. A.

Recent developments in thermal radiation system analyzer (Trasys)

Changes in the thermal radiation analyzer system (TRASYS) computer program are discussed. New capabilities were added while keeping intact the same data input structure. An overview of the program structure and general capabilities is given. Where appropriate, assessments are made of new features. The application of TRASYS peripheral programs and the importance they have in developing a totally integrated thermal analysis system are discussed. Form factor computations times were reduced approximately 40 percent, and the longer flux runs were reduced 50 percent when shadow tables were used.

Vogt, R. A.

Evaluation of use of MPAD trajectory tape and number of orbit points for orbiter mission thermal predictions

The application of using the mission planning and analysis division (MPAD) common format trajectory data tape to predict temperatures for preflight and post flight mission analysis is presented and evaluated. All of the analyses utilized the latest Space Transportation System 1 flight (STS-1) MPAD trajectory tape, and the simplified '136 note' midsection/payload bay thermal math model. For the first 6.7 hours of the STS-1 flight profile, transient temperatures are presented for selected nodal locations with the current standard method, and the trajectory tape method. Whether the differences are considered significant or not depends upon the view point. Other transient temperature predictions are also presented. These results were obtained to investigate an initial concern that perhaps the predicted temperature differences between the two methods would not only be caused by the inaccuracies of the current method's assumed nominal attitude profile but also be affected by a lack of a sufficient number of orbit points in the current method. Comparison between 6, 12, and 24 orbit point parameters showed a surprising insensitivity to the number of orbit points.

Vogt, R. A.