Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

W. Kyle Anderson

Publications and source records attributed to W. Kyle Anderson.

8 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparing Unstructured Adaptive Mesh Solutions for the High Lift Common Research Model Airfoil

Discretization error is a common source of uncertainty in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analyses. Traditional means of controlling discretization error through fixed-mesh refinement studies has proven to be difficult particularly when modeling complex geometries and flow fields. One reason for this is that mesh generation in today’s production CFD workflow is often a labor intensive process that is heavily dependent on user judgment. Unstructured mesh adaptation is known to be an efficient way to control discretization errors in CFD. Adaptive methods replace user based decision making with automated processes that optimize a mesh to reduce discretization error. This paper compares the application of multiple solution adaptive techniques in combination with multiple flow solvers to solve for the flow field about a 2D airfoil section of the NASA High-Lift Common Research Model (HL-CRM). By driving the adaptive mesh processes to a similar level of mesh convergence, the ability to achieve consistent results between multiple adaptive techniques and flow solvers is demonstrated. Mesh convergence for the various adaptive mesh approaches is compared identifying potential areas for improvement and providing mesh generation guidance for future workshops.

mesh adaptation high-lift 2D airfoil↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparing Unstructured Adaptive Mesh Solutions for the High Lift Common Research Model Airfoil

Discretization error is a common source of uncertainty in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analyses. Traditional means of controlling discretization error through fixed-mesh refinement studies has proven to be difficult particularly when modeling complex geometries and flow fields. One reason for this is that mesh generation in today’s production CFD workflow is often a labor intensive process that is heavily dependent on user judgment. Unstructured mesh adaptation is known to be an efficient way to control discretization errors in CFD. Adaptive methods replace user based decision making with automated processes that optimize a mesh to reduce discretization error. This paper compares the application of multiple solution adaptive techniques in combination with multiple flow solvers to solve for the flow field about a 2D airfoil section of the NASA High-Lift Common Research Model (HL-CRM). By driving the adaptive mesh processes to a similar level of mesh convergence, the ability to achieve consistent results between multiple adaptive techniques and flow solvers is demonstrated. Mesh convergence for the various adaptive mesh approaches is compared identifying potential areas for improvement and providing mesh generation guidance for future workshops.

mesh adaptation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Impacts of Hybrid Parallelism and Vectorization on the Performance of Newton-Krylov Methods in Computational Aerodynamics

Finding the numerical solution of moderate and high-fidelity aerodynamics problems on modern computer architectures involves, 1) decomposing the domain into smaller regions of nearly equal size, and 2) allocating computational resources for calculations on each domain and communication between domains. Modern computer clusters are composed from hierarchies of processing, memory, and communication resources with varying capabilities and latencies.This paper focuses on the combination of domain decomposition provided by ParMETIS [1]and Newton-Krylov Methods [2–5] for the solution of Computational Aerodynamics problems of interest to NASA. Herein, trade-offs encountered when mapping aerodynamics problems to modern computer architectures are explored through examples and discussions of trade-offs in parallelism from MPI [6], Open MP [7], and vectorization as partition sizes and computational resources are varied. An example of the impact that domain decomposition and MPI+OpenMPresource allocation can have on an adjoint calculation is presented in this abstract. The full paper will include more detailed examples, discussions of difficulties and potential methods to overcome them, and topics identified for future study.

Computational Aerodynamics, Hybrid Parallelism, Ve↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Assessment of UMUSCL Scheme for DNS of Turbulent Flows

Direct numerical simulation (DNS) is performed using an unstructured node-based finite-volume methodology for canonical turbulent flow configurations to assess the effect of the upwinding parameter (κ) in the unstructured monotonic upstream scheme for conservation laws (UMUSCL) reconstruction scheme. The NASA FUN3D solver is used, and four turbulent validation cases are considered: periodic Taylor-Green vortex, (2) flow through a plane channel, (3) flow through a channel with a constriction, and (4) flow over a flat plate. The results are presented for κ = 0.5, 0.9 and 1 on hexahedral grids, with the last value corresponding to a zero-numerical dissipation scheme. Detailed comparisons with available reference data indicate that for the smallest length-scales simulated, κ = 0.5 is too dissipative while κ = 1 could lead to an energy build-up. Overall, κ =0.9 yields satisfactory results in terms of accuracy and robustness for all the cases considered in this study.

Direct Numerical Simulation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Evaluation of Wall-Modeled Les for Flow Over A Multi-Element Airfoil

We perform wall-modeled large-eddy simulations (WMLES) of turbulent flow over a 30P30N multielement airfoil at various angles of attack to assess its ability to accurately predict lift using an unstructured node-based finite-volume methodology. The flow conditions are based on the experiments reported in Klausmeyer & Lin [NASA /TM-112858]. The oncoming flow Mach number is 0.2, and the stowed chord-based Reynolds number (𝑅𝑒𝑐) is 9 million. The angle of attack (𝛼) is varied between 8◦ and 23◦ with the expected stall angle of around 21◦. The simulated geometry is periodic in the span, thus any three-dimensional effects present in the experiment are ignored. We first analyze the predictions with baseline isotropic and anisotropic grids containing over 16 grid points per boundary-layer thickness. The near-wall streamwise/nominal spacing ratio is 0.4 at the leading/trailing edges of the slat, main element and flap, and 1 elsewhere, and the first wall-normal/nominal spacing ratio is 0.375 over most of the airfoil for the anisotropic grid, while these are unity for the isotropic grid. It is found that the predicted lift and wall pressures, near-wall velocity profiles, and the location of onset of resolved turbulence are sensitive to the near-wall grid anisotropy. Further sensitivities were explored at lower angles of attack by independently varying the streamwise and wall-normal grid anisotropies. The effects of both off-wall and near-wall grid refinement were also quantified. For the grid resolutions used here, our results suggest that the first wall-normal spacing, which coincides with the WMLES exchange location, has a dominant effect on the predictions for this flow configuration.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗