A Robust Pyrazolate Metal–Organic Framework for Efficient Catalysis of Dehydrogenative C–O Cross Coupling Reaction
Not Available
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Wang, Kun-Yu.
Not Available
Not Available
To precisely evaluate the potential of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) for gas separation and purification applications, it is crucial to understand how various molecules competitively adsorb inside MOFs. In this paper, we combine in situ infrared spectroscopy with ab initio calculations to investigate the mechanisms associated with co-adsorption of a number of small molecules including CO, NO, and CO 2 inside the prototypical framework Ni-MOF-74. Surprisingly, we find that the displacement of CO bound inside Ni-MOF-74 (binding energy of 53 kJ/mol) is readily driven by CO 2 exposure, even though CO 2 has a noticeably weaker binding energy of only 41 kJ/mol; meanwhile, the significantly more strongly binding NO molecule (90 kJ/mol) is not able to easily displace bound CO inside Ni-MOF74. These results show that single-phase binding energies of a molecule inside the MOF cannot completely describe their interaction with the MOF in the presence of other guest molecules. Here, we unveil a number of crucial factors such as the kinetic barrier, partial pressure, secondary binding sites, and guest-host/lateral interactions that control the co-adsorption process and combined with the binding energy are better descriptors of the behavior and adsorption of gas mixtures inside MOFs.
The defect concentration in the prototypical metal–organic framework UiO-66 can be well controlled during synthesis, leading to precisely tunable physicochemical properties for this structure. However, there has been a long-standing debate regarding the nature of the compensating species present at the defective sites. Here, we present unambiguous spectroscopic evidence that the missing-linker defect sites in an ambient environment are compensated with both carboxylate and water (bound through intermolecular hydrogen bonding), which is further supported by ab initio calculations. In contrast to the prevailing assumption that the monocarboxylate groups (COO – ) of the modulators form bidentate bonding with two Zr 4+ sites, COO – is found to coordinate to an open Zr 4+ site in an unidentate mode. The neighboring Zr 4+ site is terminated by a coordinating H 2 O molecule, which helps to stabilize the COO – group. Lastly, this finding not only provides a new understanding of defect termination in UiO-66, but also sheds light on the origin of its catalytic activity.
When designing metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), linker design is one of the most important factors in constructing a wide variety of structures. Judicious choice of linker size, geometry, and connectivity can create diverse structures and topologies, which can aid in the quest to design MOFs with both high stability and permanent porosity. Multi-connected linkers have become a focus in the MOF community, as high connectivity can improve stability and tunability of frameworks. In particular, multicarboxylate ligands have been reported extensively in the literature to construct stable MOFs with versatile pore environments, which can be termed as metal-multicarboxylate frameworks (MMCFs). These structures have great application potential in gas adsorption and separation, catalysis, and sensing. In this work, we review the literature on multicarboxylate linkers (n COOH ≥ 3) in MOF systems and their applications, with specific emphasis on how high linker connectivity affects properties of MOFs such as topology, porosity, stability, and functionality.
Varying levels of hierarchy in metal–organic framework (MOF) superstructures are achieved through seed-mediated evolution of multiple MOF modules.
Porphyrins are frequently observed in nature and play a vital role in many biological functions, including light-harvesting, oxygen transport, and catalytic transformations. The rigid, robust, and multifunctional features of porphyrins enable the construction of framework compounds such as metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) and covalent organic frameworks (COFs) for use in several important applications. This short review here summarizes the types of porphyrin building blocks with varying connectivity, their assembly into framework compounds, and key structural factors governing porphyrin ligand design. Furthermore, we highlight emerging catalytic applications of these porphyrin framework compounds as Lewis acid catalysts, oxidation catalysts, photocatalysts, and electrocatalysts. Together, this review supplies a timely update on porphyrin ligand design and framework compound synthesis and guides the future development of porphyrin framework compounds with diverse functionalities for efficient catalysis.
Not provided.