Search NASASearch

Engineering topics

Weiss, D. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Weiss, D. M..

Evaluating software development by analysis of changes - Some data from the Software Engineering Laboratory

Basili and Weiss (1984) have discussed an approach for obtaining valid data which may be used to evaluate software development methodologies in a production environment. The methodology consists of five elements, including the identification of goals, the determination of questions of interest from the goals, the development of a data collection form, the development of data collection procedures, and the validation and analysis of the data. The current investigation is concerned with the presentation of the results from such an evaluation. The presented data were collected as part of studies reported by Basili et al. (1977). These studies had been conducted by NASA's Software Engineering Laboratory (SEL). Attention is given to an overview of the SEL, the application of the considered methodology, the results of a data analysis, and conclusions about the SEL environment.

Weiss, D. M.

A methodology for collecting valid software engineering data

An effective data collection method for evaluating software development methodologies and for studying the software development process is described. The method uses goal-directed data collection to evaluate methodologies with respect to the claims made for them. Such claims are used as a basis for defining the goals of the data collection, establishing a list of questions of interest to be answered by data analysis, defining a set of data categorization schemes, and designing a data collection form. Feasibility of the data collection methodology was demonstrated by applying it to five different projects in two different environments (other NRL Reports). The application showed that the methodology was both feasible and useful.

Basili, V. R.

Evaluating software development characteristics: A comparison of software errors in different environments

Error data obtained from two different software development environments are compared. To obtain data that was complete, accurate, and meaningful, a goal-directed data collection methodology was used. Changes made to software were monitored concurrently with its development. Similarities common to both environments are included: (1) the principal error was in the design and implementation of single routines; (2) few errors were the result of changes, required more than one attempt to correct, and resulted in other errors; (3) relatively few errors took more than a day to correct.

Weiss, D. M.