Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Whitehouse, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Whitehouse, D..

Coplanar back contacts for thin silicon solar cells

The type of coplanar back contact solar cell described was constructed with interdigitated n(+) and p(+) type regions on the back of the cell, such that both contacts are made on the back with no metallization grid on the front. This cell construction has several potential advantages over conventional cells for space use namely, convenience of interconnects, lower operating temperatures and higher efficiency due to the elimination of grid shadowing. However, the processing is more complex, and the cell is inherently more radiation sensitive. The latter problem can be reduced substantially by making the cells very thin (approximately 50 micrometers). Two types of interdigitated back contact cells are possible, the types being dependent on the character of the front surface. The front surface field cell has a front surface region that is of the same conductivity type as the bulk but is more heavily doped. This creates an electric field at the surface which repels the minority carriers. The tandem junction cell has a front surface region of a conductivity type that is opposite to that of the bulk. The junction thus created floats to open circuit voltage on illumination and injects carriers into the bulk which then can be collected at the rear junction. For space use, the front surface field cell is potentially more radiation resistant than the tandem junction cell because the flow of minority carriers (electrons) into the bulk will be less sensitive to the production of recombination centers, particularly in the space charge region at the front surface.

Storti, G.↗

High efficiency ultrathin coplanar back contact cells

Efforts to fabricate high efficiency, ultrathin coplanar back contact cells are described. Included is a description of design considerations, cell fabrication, and theoretical and experimental analyses of loss mechanisms. The results of these efforts has been the fabrication of a 11.8% AM0 efficient, 50 micron cell when measured at 25 C. Design and process changes required to increase the efficiency are indicated.

Storti, G.↗