Wickman, John H. | Search NASA

NASA NTRS1992

Gelled liquid oxygen/metal powder monopropellants

Al, Al-80/Mg-20 wt pct, Si, and Fe powders were mixed with LOX and gelled with 2-3 wt pct Cab-o-Sil to viscosities of 100 to 900 cps, at shear rates of up to 300/sec. These monopropellants were burned in a cylinder that was submerged in a liquid nitrogen bath. Ambient pressure data have shown that the monopropellants were extinguished when the flame front reached regions that had been submerged under the liquid nitrogen. Burning occurred in a pulsed fashion, and was most nearly steady in the case of the Al-Mg mixture. No sparking or energetic burning occurred in any of the cases tested.

Wickman, John H.↗

NASA NTRS1991

Liquid oxygen/metal gelled monopropellants

The objectives of this program were to establish the feasibility of metallized/liquid oxygen monopropellants and select the best monopropellant formulation for continued study. The metal powders mixed with the liquid oxygen were aluminum/magnesium (80/20), silicon and iron (Iron was only tested for burning properties). The formulations were first evaluated on whether they detonated when ignited or burned. The formulations only burned when ignited. The viscosity for the formulations ranged from 900 cps to 100 cps at shear rates up to 300 seconds(sup -1). Two percent (by weight) of Cab-O-Sil was added to the aluminum and aluminum/magnesium formulations for gelling while the silicon formulation used three percent. Within a seven hour period, settling was suggested only in the 29 percent aluminum and 29 percent aluminum/magnesium formulations. The monopropellants were burned in a cylinder submerged in a liquid nitrogen bath. Experimental data at ambient pressure indicated that the monopropellants were extinguished when the flame front reached regions submerged under the liquid nitrogen. The burn rate increased dramatically when burned in a cylinder enclosure with less heat sink available to the monopropellant. The test results were inconclusive as to whether the increased burn rate was due to the lower heat sink capacity or the small amount of pressure (2 psi) generated during the burning of the monopropellant. The burning of the aluminum and aluminum/magnesium resulted in a brilliant white flame similar to that of an arc welder. These monopropellants burned in a pulsating manner with the aluminum/magnesium appearing to have less pulsating combustion. The silicon monopropellant burned with an orange glow. No sparks or energetic burning was apparent as with the aluminum or aluminum/magnesium.

Wickman, John H.↗