Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

X. Liu

Publications and source records attributed to X. Liu.

Aerosol–Ice Formation Closure: A Southern Great Plains Field Campaign

Prediction of ice formation in clouds presents one of the grand challenges in the atmospheric sciences. Immersion freezing initiated by ice-nucleating particles (INPs) is the dominant pathway of primary ice crystal formation in mixed-phase clouds, where supercooled water droplets and ice crystals coexist, with important implications for the hydrological cycle and climate. However, derivation of INP number concentrations from an ambient aerosol population in cloud-resolving and climate models remains highly uncertain. We conducted an aerosol-ice formation closure pilot study using a field-observational approach to evaluate the predictive capability of immersion freezing INPs. The closure study relies on co-located measurements of the ambient size-resolved and single-particle composition and INP number concentrations. The acquired particle data serve as input in several immersion freezing parameterizations, that are employed in cloud-resolving and climate models, for prediction of INP number concentrations. We discuss in detail one closure case study in which a front passed through the measurement site, resulting in a change of ambient particle and INP populations. We achieved closure in some circumstances within uncertainties, but we emphasize the need for freezing parameterization of potentially missing INP types and evaluation of the choice of parameterization to be employed. Overall, this closure pilot study aims to assess the level of parameter details and measurement strategies needed to achieve aerosol-ice formation closure. The closure approach is designed to accurately guide immersion freezing schemes in models, and ultimately identify the leading causes for climate model bias in INP predictions.

ice formation↗

TPSAS-NF1676L-10726-DND

The principal component radiative transfer model PCRTM (Xu 2006) simulates spectral longwave radiance at a 0.5cm-1 resolution over the wavelengths (50-2760cm-1) using 280 principal components. The CERES product SSF containing CERES field-of-view (FOV) cloud properties based on MODIS pixel information are used as inputs. NASA GMAO(Global Modeling and Assimilation Office)Geos-4 temperature and humidity profiles, as well as SMOBA (Stratosphere Monitoring Ozone Blended Analysis) ozone profiles allow computations for five years (Jan 2001- Dec 2006) of FOV nadir spectral radiance. The approximately twice daily FOV PCRTM simulations along with CERES broadband measurements are time-space averaged to 10deg zonal monthly data. Analysis of monthly seasonal and deseasonalized interannual variability in terms of brightness temperature are presented. Comparison of interannual variability in the portions of the spectrum seen by the AIRS instrument are shown. Comparisons of spectral integrated PCRTM simulations to CERES broadband longwave radiance measurements are made. In order to study the sensitivity of the spatially and temporally averaged TOA spectrum to various atmospheric properties, we perturbed atmospheric and surface temperatures, humidity, cloud height, cloud fraction, and particle size. The sensitivity of the spectrum to these properties depends on region and seasons. Month to month variability of the longwave spectra to these perturbations is 10 to 20% of the global monthly mean perturbation response. In addition, it depends on time period and size of the area used for averaging spectra. In this poster, the magnitude of sensitivity variability and how the sensitivity changes depending on temporal and spatial scale of averaging will be discussed.

Fred G. Rose↗