Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Xu, Henghui

Publications and source records attributed to Xu, Henghui.

4 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

NASICON Li 1.2 Mg 0.1 Zr 1.9 (PO 4 ) 3 Solid Electrolyte for an All‐Solid‐State Li‐Metal Battery

Abstract A thin solid electrolyte with a high Li + conductivity is used to separate the metallic lithium anode and the cathode in an all‐solid‐state Li‐metal battery. However, most solid Li‐ion electrolytes have a small electrochemical stability window, large interfacial resistance, and cannot block lithium‐dendrite growth when lithium is plated on charging of the cell. Mg 2+ stabilizes a rhombohedral NASICON‐structured solid electrolyte of the formula Li 1.2 Mg 0.1 Zr 1.9 (PO 4 ) 3 (LMZP). This solid electrolyte has Li‐ion conductivity two orders of magnitude higher at 25 °C than that of the triclinic LiZr 2 (PO 4 ) 3 . 7 Li and 6 Li NMR confirm the Li‐ions in two different crystallographic sites of the NASICON framework with 85% of the Li‐ions having a relatively higher mobility than the other 15%. The anode–electrolyte interface is further investigated with symmetric Li/LMZP/Li cell testing, while the cathode–electrolyte interface is explored with an all‐solid‐state Li/LMZP/LiFePO 4 cell. The enhanced performance of these cells enabled by the Li 1.2 Mg 0.1 Zr 1.9 (PO 4 ) 3 solid electrolyte is stable upon repeated charge/discharge cycling.

Zhou, Qiongyu↗
DOE OSTI2020

In Situ Formation of Li 3 P Layer Enables Fast Li + Conduction across Li/Solid Polymer Electrolyte Interface

Abstract Solid‐state polymer electrolytes provide better flexibility and electrode contact than their ceramic counterparts, making them a worthwhile pursuit for all‐solid‐state lithium‐metal batteries. However, their large Li/solid state electrolyte interfacial resistance, small critical current density, and rapid lithium dendrite growth during cycling still limit their viability. Owing to these restrictions, all‐solid‐state cells with solid polymer electrolytes must be cycled above room‐temperature and with a small current density. These problems can be mitigated with an in situ formed artificial solid electrolyte interphase that rapidly conducts Li + ions. Herein, a Li 3 P layer formed in situ at the Li‐metal/solid polymer electrolyte interphase is reported that significantly reduces the electrode/electrolyte interfacial resistance. Additionally, this layer increases the wettability of the solid polymer by the metallic lithium anode, allowing for the critical current density of lithium symmetric cells to be doubled by homogenizing the current density at the interface. All‐solid‐state Li/Li symmetric cells and Li/LiFePO 4 cells with the Li 3 P layer show improved cycling performance with a high current density.

Wu, Nan↗
DOE OSTI2020

Enhanced Surface Interactions Enable Fast Li + Conduction in Oxide/Polymer Composite Electrolyte

Abstract Li + ‐conducting oxides are considered better ceramic fillers than Li + ‐insulating oxides for improving Li + conductivity in composite polymer electrolytes owing to their ability to conduct Li + through the ceramic oxide as well as across the oxide/polymer interface. Here we use two Li + ‐insulating oxides (fluorite Gd 0.1 Ce 0.9 O 1.95 and perovskite La 0.8 Sr 0.2 Ga 0.8 Mg 0.2 O 2.55 ) with a high concentration of oxygen vacancies to demonstrate two oxide/poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)‐based polymer composite electrolytes, each with a Li + conductivity above 10 −4 S cm −1 at 30 °C. Li solid‐state NMR results show an increase in Li + ions (>10 %) occupying the more mobile A2 environment in the composite electrolytes. This increase in A2‐site occupancy originates from the strong interaction between the O 2− of Li‐salt anion and the surface oxygen vacancies of each oxide and contributes to the more facile Li + transport. All‐solid‐state Li‐metal cells with these composite electrolytes demonstrate a small interfacial resistance with good cycling performance at 35 °C.

Wu, Nan↗