Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Yonghoon Choi

Publications and source records attributed to Yonghoon Choi.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2024

Sea Salt Reactivity Over the Northwest Atlantic: an in-Depth Look Using the Airborne ACTIVATE Dataset

Chloride (Cl−) displacement from sea salt particles is an extensively studied phenomenon with implications for human health, visibility, and the global radiation budget. Past works have investigated Cl− depletion over the northwest Atlantic (NWA); however, an updated, multi-seasonal, and geographically expanded account of sea salt reactivity over the region is needed. This study uses chemically resolved mass concentrations and meteorological data from the airborne Aerosol Cloud meTeorology Interactions oVer the western ATlantic Experiment (ACTIVATE) to quantify seasonal, spatial, and meteorological trends in Cl− depletion and to explore the importance of quantifying (1) non-sea salt sources of Na+ and (2) mass concentrations of lost Cl− (instead of relative amounts displaced). Lost Cl− mass concentrations are lowest in December–February and March, moderate around Bermuda in June, and highest in May (median losses of 0.04, 0.04, 0.66, and 1.76µgm−3, respectively), with losses in May that are high enough to potentially accelerate tropospheric oxidation rates. Inorganic acidic species can account for all Cl− depletion in December–February, March, and June near Bermuda but none of the lost Cl− in May, suggesting that organic acids may be of importance for Cl− displacement in certain months. Contributions of dust to Na+ are not important seasonally but may cause relevant overestimates of lost Cl− in smoke and dust plumes. Higher percentages of Cl− depletion often do not correspond to larger mass concentrations of lost Cl−, so it is highly recommended to quantify the latter to place depletion reactions in context with their role in atmospheric oxidation and radiative forcing.

ACTIVATE↗
NASA NTRS2023

Spatially-Coordinated Airborne Data and Complementary Products for Aerosol, Gas, Cloud, and Meteorological Studies: the Nasa Activate Dataset

The NASA Aerosol Cloud meTeorology Interactions oVer the western ATlantic Experiment (ACTIVATE) produced a unique dataset for research into aerosol–cloud–meteorology interactions, with applications extending from process-based studies to multi-scale model intercomparison and improvement as well as to remote-sensing algorithm assessments and advancements. ACTIVATE used two NASA Langley Research Center aircraft, a HU-25 Falcon and King Air, to conduct systematic and spatially coordinated flights over the northwest Atlantic Ocean, resulting in 162 joint flights and 17 other single-aircraft flights between 2020 and 2022 across all seasons. Data cover 574 and 592 cumulative flights hours for the HU-25 Falcon and King Air, respectively. The HU-25 Falcon conducted profiling at different level legs below, in, and just above boundary layer clouds (< 3 km) and obtained in situ measurements of trace gases, aerosol particles, clouds, and atmospheric state parameters. Under cloud-free conditions, the HU-25 Falcon similarly conducted profiling at different level legs within and immediately above the boundary layer. The King Air (the high-flying aircraft) flew at approximately ∼ 9 km and conducted remote sensing with a lidar and polarimeter while also launching dropsondes (785 in total). Collectively, simultaneous data from both aircraft help to characterize the same vertical column of the atmosphere. In addition to individual instrument files, data from the HU-25 Falcon aircraft are combined into “merge files” on the publicly available data archive that are created at different time resolutions of interest (e.g., 1, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60 s, or matching an individual data product's start and stop times). This paper describes the ACTIVATE flight strategy, instrument and complementary dataset products, data access and usage details, and data application notes. The data are publicly accessible through https://doi.org/10.5067/SUBORBITAL/ACTIVATE/DATA001 (ACTIVATE Science Team, 2020).

Aerosol Cloud meTeorology Interactions oVer the we↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparing the Regional Variability of Emission Factors of Greenhouse Gases Over Different Landscape During FIREX-AQ Campaign

Biomass burning (wildfires, prescribed and agricultural burning) is one of the major sources of trace gases and particulate emissions and annual variability in growth rates. Biomass burning can impact local, regional, and global air quality, as well as climate. Measurements of emissions from biomass burning are crucial to a better understanding of how it influences and interacts with biogeochemical cycles. High resolution in-situ measurements were recorded onboard the NASA DC-8 aircraft during the FIREX-AQ (Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality) airborne field campaign July-September, 2019, which was conducted over the continental U.S. Fire emission factors (EF) are essential input for emissions models used to develop biomass burning emission inventories. Here we present the Emission Ratio (ER), MCE (Modified Combustion Efficiency), and EF (Emission Factor) of CO2, CO, and CH4, which constitute the majority of carbon emitted from the wildland, prescribed, and agricultural fires. EFCO2, EFCO, and EFCH4 from the Wildland fires at Williams Flats, WA (primarily Douglas Fir, Ponderosa pine, wheatgrass: 50-75%), ranged from 1527 – 1820 g/kg (Avg. 1641±42), 6.5 – 174.1 g/kg (110.5±24.1), and 0.7 – 11.3 g/kg (6.2±1.9), respectively. EFs from the Arizona CASTLE fire, with somewhat different fuel sources (primarily Ponderosa pine, Douglas fir: 40-70%) ranged from 1266 – 1667 g/kg (1596±59), 99.5 – 344.5 g/kg (136.7±36.8), and 0.4 – 9.2 g/kg (7.2±1.7), respectively. Another primary driver of EFs is likely fire weather. Detailed variability of greenhouse gas EFs will be examined and presented in accordance with different fuels and fire conditions at burned areas, specifically within unique wildland and croplands, using the FCCS (Fuel Characteristic Classification System) 30m land cover identification and the Cropland Data Layer (CDL).

Biomass burning↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparing the regional variability of emission factors of greenhouse gases over different landscape during FIREX-AQ campaign

Biomass burning (wildfires, prescribed and agricultural burning) is one of the major sources of trace gases and particulate emissions and annual variability in growth rates. Biomass burning can impact local, regional, and global air quality, as well as climate. Measurements of emissions from biomass burning are crucial to a better understanding of how it influences and interacts with biogeochemical cycles. High resolution in-situ measurements were recorded onboard the NASA DC-8 aircraft during the FIREX-AQ (Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality) airborne field campaign July-September, 2019, which was conducted over the continental U.S. Fire emission factors (EF) are essential input for emissions models used to develop biomass burning emission inventories. Here we present the Emission Ratio (ER), MCE (Modified Combustion Efficiency), and EF (Emission Factor) of CO2, CO, and CH4, which constitute the majority of carbon emitted from the wildland, prescribed, and agricultural fires. EFCO2, EFCO, and EFCH4 from the Wildland fires at Williams Flats, WA (primarily Douglas Fir, Ponderosa pine, wheatgrass: 50-75%), ranged from 1527 – 1820 g/kg (Avg. 1641±42), 6.5 – 174.1 g/kg (110.5±24.1), and 0.7 – 11.3 g/kg (6.2±1.9), respectively. EFs from the Arizona CASTLE fire, with somewhat different fuel sources (primarily Ponderosa pine, Douglas fir: 40-70%) ranged from 1266 – 1667 g/kg (1596±59), 99.5 – 344.5 g/kg (136.7±36.8), and 0.4 – 9.2 g/kg (7.2±1.7), respectively. Another primary driver of EFs is likely fire weather. Detailed variability of greenhouse gas EFs will be examined and presented in accordance with different fuels and fire conditions at burned areas, specifically within unique wildland and croplands, using the FCCS (Fuel Characteristic Classification System) 30m land cover identification and the Cropland Data Layer (CDL).

Biomass burning↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Observation of Trace Gases Seasonal Variability in the Marine Boundary Layer over the Atlantic Ocean during the ACTIVATE Field Campaign

High resolution in-situ measurements of carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and water vapor (H2O) were made onboard the NASA HU-25 aircraft during the ACTIVATE (Aerosol Cloud meteorology Interactions oVer the western Atlantic Experiment) campaign during 2020 and 2021 in different seasons (winter through summer) over the mid-latitude western Atlantic Ocean. As most of the flights focused on the marine boundary layer (MBL) during the campaign, these trace gas observations are an excellent data set to examine seasonal variability of trace gas background values in the MBL without the influence of localized point sources. We will describe the variability of these trace gases in the MBL background by filtering out concentrated point sources using back trajectory analysis along with trace gas ratios. Additionally, the ocean is a significant sink of anthropogenic CO2 capturing about one quarter of total anthropogenic carbon. By looking at the MBL CO2 variation as a function of season, we discuss observed changes in CO2 uptake over the ocean. These high accuracy observations of trace gas backgrounds in the MBL along with characterizing seasonal effects on oceanic sequestering of anthropogenic CO2 will improve the understanding of seasonal variations and change in climate and inverse modelling over the ocean.

Yonghoon Choi↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Exploring the Continuum of Stratiform and Cumulus Cloudiness: Observational Insights Related to Marine Boundary Layer Clouds

Low-level marine clouds take on a wide range of morphological states owing to external forcing and internal feedbacks. Rarely are shallow marine clouds adequately described by a single simplified framework but instead exhibit features that partially conform to several states that could be considered “limiting”. Perhaps the most apparent dichotomy is whether to consider shallow clouds as existing within a surface-driven mixed layer or as convective “plume” elements positioned on top. Do the rules that govern the limiting cases transition smoothly through the hybrid scenarios found in nature, or are there particular regions of attraction or repulsion?We have identified 3 ”axes” along which to investigate how the energetics, thermodynamics and cloud macro structure relate to the intermediate spaces between idealizations.

Ewan Crosbie↗