Force balance model predictions of sliding bubbles velocity in vertical subcooled boiling flow
Not Available
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Yoo, Junsoo.
Not Available
The bubble sliding after departing from nucleation site is frequently observed in flow boiling systems and, the crucial impact on wall heat transfer has been evidenced through many experiments. As a result, the heat transfer modeling associated with sliding bubble has become one of the subjects of great attention in CFD boiling heat transfer community. The modeling efforts are primarily aimed at improving the existing Heat Flux Partitioning (HFP) model via the implementation of sliding bubble-induced heat transfer. The performance of HFP model depends inherently on the fidelity of sub-models used to predict the fundamental bubble parameters (e.g., bubble departure/lift-off diameter). In the same context, the accurate prediction of sliding bubble parameters (e.g., sliding bubble growth, sliding bubble velocity) is essential to achieving the successful heat transfer modeling associated with sliding bubble. Of many sliding bubble parameters, this paper deals with the sliding bubble velocity. Specifically, the force balance model was assessed in view of the sliding bubble velocity prediction. The parametric effect of key sub-models (e.g., drag force, bubble growth models) used in the force balance equation was investigated. The experimental data from Maity (2000) and Yoo et al. (2016) were used for demonstrating the model predictive performance. It was found that the force balance model proposed in this study was able to predict well the bubble sliding velocity based on the accurate prediction of bubble growth during sliding. The predictive performance was proven with the experimental data measured under various subcooled boiling conditions of both water and refrigerant (NOVEC-7000) flowing upward in vertical channels.
Recently, a Eulerian-based two-fluid computational fluid dynamics (CFD) framework with a wall heat flux partitioning approach has been intensively investigated for departure from nucleate boiling (DNB) simulation under the U.S. Department of Energy–funded Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors (CASL) program. Understanding of the DNB characteristics over a range of pressurized water reactor–like operating conditions and accurate prediction of boiling crisis in the nuclear power system have been grand challenges because of the large impact of DNB on reactor safety and operational economics. The ultimate goal of this task in the CASL program is to introduce a robust multiphase CFD–based DNB modeling framework that is capable of characterizing an entire boiling history in which the wall boiling mode experiences the following through multiple stages of heat transfer mode: (1) single-phase convective heat transfer, (2) nucleate boiling heat transfer, and (3) identification of the departure of nucleate boiling. To validate the CASL boiling model, we have benchmarked simulated DNB over three different flow channel configurations (pipe flow, 5 × 5 fuel bundle with mixing vane tests, and 5 × 5 fuel bundle without mixing vane tests) against experimental measurements, and the validation result with open literature is reported. The DNB detection criteria in the simulation are checked by monitoring the peak wall temperature, wall dryout factor, and net energy balance. In addition to the DNB performance test, some preliminary sensitivity results on closure model selection are reported to address the prediction capability of local void profile against measurements. The boiling simulation tested in this study exhibits a maximum deviation of 24% from the measured DNB value in a high-pressure (i.e., 138 bars) subcooled pipe flow test. The ranges of operating conditions are as follows: 1650 to 2650 kg/m 2 ·s for mass flux and 8.5 to 96 K for subcooled inlet temperature. The deviation is even reduced to 7% when the subcooled temperature is less than 40 K. Besides accuracy, base practice guidelines for DNB detection criteria are tested by monitoring three simulation variables: (1) maximum wall temperature, (2) wall dryout factor (i.e., K-value), and (3) energy balance. Numerical robustness of DNB simulation is largely achieved in most of the validation test except for a few high subcooled test cases.