Search NASASearch

Engineering topics

Young, Aaron

Publications and source records attributed to Young, Aaron.

IRIS-GNN: Leveraging Graph Neural Networks for Scheduling on Truly Heterogeneous Runtime Systems

The diversity of accelerators in computer systems poses significant challenges for software developers, such as managing vendor-specific compiler toolchains, code fragmentation requiring different kernel implementations, and performance portability issues. To address these, the Intelligent Runtime System (IRIS) was developed. IRIS works across various systems, from smartphones to supercomputers, enabling automatic performance scaling based on available accelerators. It introduces abstract tasks for seamless execution transitions between accelerators while ensuring memory consistency and task dependencies. Although IRIS simplifies system details, optimal dynamic scheduling still requires user input to understand workload structures. To address this, we introduce a new scheduling policy for IRIS, termed IRIS-GNN, which is the first IRIS hybrid policy that operates in conjunction with the dynamic policies. This policy employs a Graph-Neural Network (GNN) to conduct Graph Classification of any task graphs submitted to IRIS. This GNN analyzes the structure and attributes of the task graph, categorizing it as either locality, concurrency, or mixed. This classification subsequently guides the selection of the dynamic policy used by IRIS. We provide a comparison of the performance of IRIS-GNN against the complete spectrum of IRIS’s dynamic policies, assess the overhead introduced by the GNN within this scheduling framework, and ultimately explore its practical application in real-world scenarios.

Johnston, Beau

IRIS: High-fidelity Perception Sensor Modeling for Closed-Loop Planetary Simulations

Perception plays a key role in autonomous and semi-autonomous planetary exploration vehicles. For instance, landers can use computer vision techniques for identifying safe landing locations, aerial vehicles use cameras as navigation sensors, and planetary rovers use them for localization and hazard detection. Engineering simulations of such systems requires the accurate modeling of perception and vision sensors for simulating autonomy scenarios. In addition, the modeling of sensors for landers, aerial and ground vehicles requires the ability to handle large and high-resolution terrains, the accurate modeling of illumination, hi-fidelity rendering via ray/path tracing and the inclusion of sensor characteristics. Vision sensor models strive to simulate sensor reality by using physics principles to model the interaction of light and objects. Furthermore, high frame rate performance is highly desirable for in-the-loop simulations involving vehicle dynamics and control software. In this paper we describe a new sensor modeling capability called Inter-planetary Rendering for Imaging and Sensors (IRIS) that meets these requirements for the real-time and high-fidelity simulation of vision sensors for planetary aerospace and robotics applications.

Elmquist, Asher

Lost in Translation: the Case for Integrated Testing

The building of a spacecraft is complex and often involves multiple suppliers and companies that have their own designs and processes. Standards have been developed across the industries to reduce the chances for critical flight errors at the system level, but the spacecraft is still vulnerable to the introduction of critical errors during integration of these systems. Critical errors can occur at any time during the process and in many cases, human reliability analysis (HRA) identifies human error as a risk driver. Most programs have a test plan in place that is intended to catch these errors, but it is not uncommon for schedule and cost stress to result in less testing than initially planned. Therefore, integrated testing, or "testing as you fly," is essential as a final check on the design and assembly to catch any errors prior to the mission. This presentation will outline the unique benefits of integrated testing by catching critical flight errors that can otherwise go undetected, discuss HRA methods that are used to identify opportunities for human error, lessons learned and challenges over ownership of testing will be discussed.

Young, Aaron