Engineering topics

Zachary R Putnam

Publications and source records attributed to Zachary R Putnam.

10 records

NASA NTRS2020

Aerocapture as an Enhancing Option for Ice Giants Missions

Investigation of Uranus and Neptune, via orbiter and atmospheric probes, is required to answer pressing science questions that have been raised in previous Decadal Surveys. As the Ice Giants are the farthest planets from Earth, traditional fully-propulsive orbit insertion missions would require a large amount of propellant, leaving less mass for the scientific payload; additionally, transit time to the planetary bodies near 13-15 years. Aerocapture uses aerodynamic forces generated by flight within a planetary atmosphere to decelerate and achieve orbit insertion. Although, aerocapture has not been used in the past, recent developments in thermal protection systems, guidance and control, and navigation capabilities enable the use of rigid, heritage entry vehicle configurations already flown at other planetary bodies for Ice Giants aerocapture. With the addition of these recent capabilities, aerocapture can robustly deliver spacecraft to Ice Giant orbits, while substantially increasing on-orbit payload mass (more than 40%) and reducing the transit time by 2-5 years (15-30%) relative to fully-propulsive orbit insertion.

Soumyo Dutta↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation of Linear Covariance Techniques for Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Guidance and Navigation Performance Analysis

Current Monte Carlo-based uncertainty analysis methods may require significant computational resources to evaluate the performance of a closed-loop guidance, navigation, and control system. An attractive alternative, particularly during the preliminary and conceptual design phase, is to use linear covariance analysis, which can provide the same statistical information as Monte Carlo methods at a fraction of the computational load. Linear covariance has already been demonstrated in various spaceflight regimes, but only recently has it been applied to atmospheric flight. In this study, a 6-degree-of-freedom formulation of both a linear covariance and Monte Carlo analysis tools are utilized for a Mars entry, descent, and landing scenario which capture both atmospheric and powered flight phases to support precision landing. Comparison of the performance results shows close agreement between the linear covariance and traditional Monte Carlo methods when incorporating an assortment of guidance algorithms and processing a variety of inertial and relative sensor measurements onboard the lander's navigation filter.

James W. Williams↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Robust Trajectory Optimization for Guided Powered Descent and Landing

A robust trajectory optimization approach for guidance algorithm gain selection for powered descent and landing is developed. This approach uses a genetic algorithm to determine optimal guidance algorithm parameters while incorporating uncertainty information from linear covariance analysis. The optimal guidance algorithm parameters are determined while accounting for environment, navigation, and vehicle property uncertainty and sensor suite fidelity. As a demonstration of this method, the optimal gains for the fractional polynomial powered descent guidance are found for the braking phase of a robotic lunar landing mission. Scenarios with differing sensor suites and sensor qualities are considered, with objective functions to minimize variability in propellant usage or terminal position. Results show that the optimal guidance algorithm gains for a given trajectory differ based on the sensor suite, and optimal guidance algorithm gains may result in up to 20% performance improvements over the baseline in propellant usage and landed accuracy.

Grace E Calkins↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Control Algorithms for Flap-Based Mars Entry Systems

All guided entries of blunt-body entry vehicles have utilized bank-angle steering for hypersonic trajectory control. While bank-angle steering has been suc- cessful on Mars entry missions thus far, such as the Mars Science Laboratory and Mars 2020 missions, this control scheme involves a high degree of coupling over the longitudinal and lateral motion. To simultaneously control these two directions of flight, bank-angle steering vehicles typically select the bank angle magnitude to control the longitudinal motion and perform periodic bank reversals to limit the error in the lateral direction. These bank reversals are undesirable as they are performed open loop and can inject error into the trajectory. An alternative hypersonic control scheme modules the vehicle’s angle of attack (α) and sideslip angle (β) to steer the vehicle, i.e. α − β steering. Also called direct force control (DFC), α − β steering has been recently studied in the literature for both entry and aerocapture missions at several planetary bodies including Mars, Venus, Titan, and the ice giants. α − β steering provides more decoupled control over the trajectory than bank-angle steering by mostly using α to control the longitudinal motion and mostly using β to control the lateral motion. Using α − β steering avoids the bank reversals associated with bank-angle steering, and studies have shown that α − β steering may provide increased robustness to atmospheric dispersions, higher precision in landing accuracy, a lower propellant usage for powered descent, and a larger payload mass, relative to bank-angle steering. Several different actuation concepts have been studied for α − β steering, including moving mass systems, a morphing vehicle structure, and aerodynamic flaps.

Daniel L Engel↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Assessment of Control Algorithms for Mars Entry Vehicles With Flap-Based Trajectory Control Under Uncertainty

Flap-based steering systems on blunt-body entry vehicles may improve flight performance relative to heritage bank-angle steering systems. Successful implementation of articulating aerodynamic flaps on a hypersonic entry vehicle requires an active control system to map angle of attack and sidelip angle commands to flap deflection commands. Here, a successive-linearization model prective control algorithm, as a linear quadratic regulator, are formulated, designed, and assessed to address this multiple input multiple output control problem. These two control algorithms are assessed under uncertainty in Monte Carlo simulations for various control profiles and vehicle configurations. Results indicate that while both control algorithms provide successful command tracking under uncertainty, the model predictive controller provides a lower mean and integral error, as well as greater robustness, relative to the linear-quadratic regulator.

Daniel L Engel↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Magnetohydrodynamic and Aerodynamic Assessment of Ballistic Entry of a 70deg Spherecone at Mars and Venus

An electrical conductivity database for continuum flow in a CO2 atmosphere over a 70 deg spherecone was created using the Data Parallel Line Relaxation Code computational fluid dynamics software to inform development of future magnetohydrodynamic subsystems at Venus and Mars. Sixteen freestream conditions were considered at Mars with atmospheric relative velocities from 5 to 8 km/s and altitudes between 20 and 80 km. Sixteen freestream conditions were considered at Venus with atmospheric relative velocities from 9 to 12 km/s and altitudes between 85 and 115 km. Results indicate that the total electrical conductivity in the flow volume always increases as velocity increases. At low velocities, the electrical conductivity is higher at high altitudes, while at high velocities, the electrical conductivity is higher at low altitudes. Three of the 80 km altitude computational fluid dynamics solutions show good agreement with Direct Simulation Monte Carlo results. In general, computational fluid dynamics predicts thinner shocks, higher electron number density, and similar vibrational temperatures as direct simulation Monte Carlo. The magnetohydrodynamic force was calculated at both Mars and Venus. Results indicate there may not be sufficient control authority to use magnetohydrodynamics as a trajectory control mechanism at Mars without artificially increasing the electrical conductivity of the flow, but there may be appreciable control authority for a drag-modulated aerocapture at Venus.

Destiny M Fawley↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Flight Performance Comparison of Bank-Angle Steering and Alpha-Beta Steering for Mars Entry Systems

Alpha-beta steering is an alternative hypersonic steering scheme to state-of-the-art bank-angle steering systems for guided Mars entry vehicles. This study uses opti- mal control to generate steering commands for a large robotic Mars entry vehicle using either a bank-angle or alpha-beta steering system to provide a more equal comparison of these two hypersonic steering options, not dependent on guidance design or the inclusion of conventional bank reversals. Objectives maximizing terminal altitude or minimizing control effort, while also reaching a desired target point are considered for both steering options in nominal and dispersed cases. Re- sults indicate both steering options have similar performance, although alpha-beta steering is shown to have improved targeting performance, particularly for the lati- tude/crossrange. Alpha-beta steering is also able to reach higher terminal altitudes by about 0.25 km, relative to the vehicle using bank-angle steering. The difference in altitude maximization capability grows as the allowable vehicle rates decrease.

Daniel L Engel↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparison of Mars Entry Performance Using Bank-Angle and Alpha-Beta Steering Systems

State-of-the-art Mars entry systems havemodulated the bank angle (σ) on blunt-body entry capsulesto steer, providing hypersonic trajectory control. These bank-angle steering vehicles have provided successful entries forboth the Mars 2020 and Mars Science Laboratory missions, achieving landing accuracy on the order of several kilometers. Conventional guidance algorithms for these vehicles choose the bank magnitude to control the longitudinal motionand periodically change the sign of the bank angle to managethe lateral error through open-loop bank reversals. While these bank reversals are relatively simple to implement, they can inject error into the trajectory. More sophisticated steering commands simultaneously considering the lateral and longitudinal motion can potentially obtain higher entry performance, although the high coupling over the lateral and longitudinal motion remains. Bank-angle steering systemsfor Mars entries have achieved a trim angle of attack (α) for steering by offseting the center-of-gravity (CG) usinginert ballast mass and payload packaging. This ballast mass can be a significant, relative to the mass of the payload, reducing the payload mass. Lastly bank-angle steering vehicles typically modulate the bank angle using reactioncontrol system (RCS) thrusters, which can interfere with thehypersonic wake behind the entry vehicle, potentially limitingcontrollability.

Mars↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Evaluation of Magnet Configurations for Magnetohydrodynamic Trajectory Control during Planetary Entry

Magnetohydrodynamics is a phenomenon that can be harnessed during planetary entry to augment aerodynamic drag and may enable higher mass payloads to safely reach the surface. The magnetohydrodynamic force is quantified over a wide range of freestream conditions using computational fluid dynamics results from a previous study. The force is calculated for an array of small electromagnets, a large non-superconducting magnet, a large superconducting magnet, and a uniform field. The superconducting magnet produces a magnetohydrodynamic force within an order of magnitude of aerodynamic drag for velocities higher than 10 km/s, indicating that it may have a reasonable impact on the trajectory for some cases. The array of small magnets and non-superconducting magnet produced a magnetohydrodynamic force that is less than 1% of the aerodynamic drag, so their magnetic fields are not strong enough to affect an entry trajectory. Additionally, the magnet placement plays an important role in magnetohydrodynamic force magnitude, with a magnet located near the shoulder producing approximately eight times more force than a magnet placed on the axis of symmetry. A mass and power budget for each magnet configuration is given assuming current state-of-the-art magnet technology. This study also discusses implementation challenges for each type of magnet on a spacecraft.

Magnetohydrodynamics↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Guidance Performance of Bank-Angle and Alpha-Beta Steering for A Large Robotic Mars Entry Vehicle

Entry performance using Apollo-based entry guidance is assessed with a future entry system for a large robotic payload. Both a traditional bank-angle steering system and an innovative alpha-beta steering concept are considered to compare flight performance. Results indicate alpha-beta steering provides an order of magnitude improvement in crossrange error and mean altitudes up to 1 km higher than bank-angle steering. Results also show alpha-beta steering provides downrange errors with a spread half of that of bank-angle steering. Lastly, alpha-beta steering is found to provide a narrower spread of terminal altitude, Mach number, and dynamic pressure, indicating safer parachute deploy conditions.

Daniel L Engel↗