Engineering topics

Zappala, Vincenzo

Publications and source records attributed to Zappala, Vincenzo.

6 records

NASA NTRS1992

Simulated families: A test for different methods of family identification

A set of families generated in fictitious impact events (leading to a wide range of 'structure' in the orbital element space have been superimposed to various backgrounds of different densities in order to investigate the efficiency and the limitations of the methods used by Zappala et al. (1990) and by Bendjoya et al. (1990) for identifying asteroid families. In addition, an evaluation of the expected interlopers at different significance levels and the possibility of improving the definition of the level of maximum significant of a given family were analyzed.

Bendjoya, Philippe↗

NASA NTRS1992

From asteroid clusters to families: A proposal for a new nomenclature

Some confusion on the number, reliability, and characteristics of asteroid families is the result of using the single word 'family' for naming asteroid groupings identified in very different ways. Here we propose a new terminology which in our opinion would alleviate this problem.

Farinella, Paolo↗

NASA NTRS1992

A comparison between families obtained from different proper elements

Using the hierarchical method of family identification developed by Zappala et al., the results coming from the data set of proper elements computed by Williams (about 2100 numbered + about 1200 PLS 2 asteroids) and by Milani and Knezevic (5.7 version, about 4200 asteroids) are compared. Apart from some expected discrepancies due to the different data sets and/or low accuracy of proper elements computed in peculiar dynamical zones, a good agreement was found in several cases. It follows that these high reliability families represent a sample which can be considered independent on the methods used for their proper elements computation. Therefore, they should be considered as the best candidates for detailed physical studies.

Zappala, Vincenzo↗

NASA NTRS1989

Asteroid families - Physical properties and evolution

Asteroid families are considered to be fragments from collisional destruction of precursor bodies. However, results available on the inferred mineralogy, size distributions, and spins of family members do not confirm the expectations of the traditional model. Only a handful of nearly 100 proposed families, most of them populous, have distributions of inferred mineralogies consistent with simple cosmochemical models for parent bodies. It is suggested that most catastrophic collisions may not result in observable families, but rather in a spray of smaller particles, thus accounting for the small number of confirmed and consistent families, despite evidence for extensive collisional evolution of asteroids.

Chapman, Clark R.↗

NASA NTRS1989

Asteroid rotation rates - Distributions and statistics

An analysis of asteroid rotation rates and light-curve amplitudes disclosed many significant correlations between these rotation parameters and asteroid diameter, with distinct changes occurring near 125 km, a diameter above which self-gravity may become important. It is suggested that this size range may represent a division between surviving primordial asteroids and collisional fragments. A comparison of rotational parameters between family and nonfamily asteroids showed that the Koronis and Eos families exhibit noticeable differences, considered to be due to different impact conditions and/or to a relatively younger age for the Koronis family.

Binzel, Richard P.↗

NASA NTRS1989

Do asteroids have satellites?

A substantial body of indirect evidence suggests that some asteroids have satellites, although none has been detected unambiguously. Collisions between asteroids provide physically plausible mechanisms for the production of binaries, but these operate with low probability; only a small minority of asteroids are likely to have satellites. The abundance of binary asteorids can constrain the collisional history of the entire belt population. The allowed angular momentum of binaries and their rate of tidal evolution limit separations to no more than a few tens of the primary's radii. Their expected properties are consistent with failure to detect them by current imaging techniques.

Weidenschilling, Stuart J.↗