Zhao, T. T. | Search NASA

DOE OSTI2020

A coupled polygonal DEM-LBM technique based on an immersed boundary method and energy-conserving contact algorithm

Here we present a framework of coupling polygonal discrete elements and the lattice Boltzmann method using a direct forcing immersed boundary scheme. In this technique, an energy-conserving contact algorithm is utilized to handle the interactions between convex and concave polygonal particles. The surface of a polygon is represented by discrete boundary points which includes vertices of polygonal particles and/or points interpolated from vertices. The fluid-particle coupling is obtained through the interactions of the boundary points and the imaginary fluid particles using a direct-forcing immersed boundary method. Validations of the proposed technique are made by single particle and multiple arbitrarily-shaped particle sedimentation tests, and the effect of particle shape is illustrated using a drafting-kissing-tumbling benchmark.

42 ENGINEERING↗

DOE OSTI2020

Instability and treatments of the coupled discrete element and lattice Boltzmann method by the immersed moving boundary scheme

The immersed moving boundary (IMB) scheme has been extensively used to couple the discrete element method (DEM) with the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM). In the literature, only the formulation of IMB for lattice nodal cells covered by a single-solid particle was given. The treatment of situations where a nodal cell is covered by two or more solid particles is seldom discussed. It is found that some numerical instability can occur for such situations due to an inappropriate computation of the weighting function in the IMB formulation. This work presents an enhanced treatment that can resolve the issue and validates it using some benchmark tests. Furthermore, to avoid the extra costs associated with the treatment and simplify the complicated procedure introduced, a simplified IMB scheme is proposed. The accuracy of both enhanced and simplified IMB schemes are validated by test cases including single-particle sedimentation, two-particle drafting-kissing-tumbling phenomenon, and multiple-particle sedimentation. Then, the robustness of both schemes is examined and discussed using a specially designed flow past cylinders test. Overall, the simplified IMB scheme is proved to be robust and sufficiently accurate and simpler and more effective than the enhanced scheme.

42 ENGINEERING↗