Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

deBoer, Richard James

Publications and source records attributed to deBoer, Richard James.

The 22Ne($$\alpha $$,n)25Mg reaction - state of the art, astrophysics, and perspectives

Abstract One of the most important stellar neutron sources is the 22 Ne( $$\alpha ,n$$ α , n ) 25 Mg reaction, which gets activated both during the helium intershell burning in asymptotic giant branch stars and in core helium and shell carbon burning in massive stars. The 22 Ne( $$\alpha ,n$$ α , n ) 25 Mg reaction serves as the main neutron producer for the weak s -process and provides a short but strong neutron exposure during the helium flash phase of the main s -process, significantly affecting the abundances at the s -process branch points. The cross section needs to be known at very low energies, as close as possible to the neutron threshold at $$E_\alpha =$$ E α = 562 keV ( Q = −478 keV), but both direct and indirect measurements have turned out to be very challenging, leading to significant uncertainties. Here we discuss the current status of the reaction, including recent and upcoming measurements, and provide a discussion on the astrophysical implications as well as an outlook into the near future.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Deep underground measurement of B 11 ( α , n ) N 14

The primordial elemental abundance composition of the first stars leads to questions about their modes of energy production and nucleosynthesis. The formation of 12 C has been thought to occur primarily through the 3α process, however, alternative reaction chains may contribute significantly, such as 7 Li (α, γ) 11 B (α,n) 14 N. This reaction sequence cannot only bypass the mass A = 8 stability gap, but could also be a source of neutrons in the first star environment. However, the efficiency of this reaction chain depends on the possible enhancement of its low energy cross section by α-cluster resonances near the reaction threshold. A new study of the reaction 11 B(α,n) 14 N has been undertaken at the CASPAR underground facility at beam energies from 300–700 keV. A 4π neutron detector in combination with pulse shape discrimination at low background conditions resulted in the ability to probe energies lower than previously measured. Further, resonance strengths were determined for both the resonance at a laboratory energy of 411 keV, which was measured for the second time, and for a new resonance at 337 keV that has been measured for the first time. This resonance, found to be significantly weaker than previous estimates, dominates the reaction rate at lower temperatures (T < 0.2 KG) and reduces the reaction rate in first star environments.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Performing Bayesian Analyses With AZURE2 Using BRICK: An Application to the 7 Be System

Phenomenological R-matrix has been a standard framework for the evaluation of resolved resonance cross section data in nuclear physics for many years. It is a powerful method for comparing different types of experimental nuclear data and combining the results of many different experimental measurements in order to gain a better estimation of the true underlying cross sections. Yet a practical challenge has always been the estimation of the uncertainty on both the cross sections at the energies of interest and the fit parameters, which can take the form of standard level parameters. Frequentist (χ 2 -based) estimation has been the norm. In this work, a Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampler, emcee, has been implemented for the R-matrix code AZURE2, creating the Bayesian R-matrix Inference Code Kit (BRICK). Bayesian uncertainty estimation has then been carried out for a simultaneous R-matrix fit of the 3 He (α,γ) 7 Be and 3 He (α,α) 3 He reactions in order to gain further insight into the fitting of capture and scattering data. Both data sets constrain the values of the bound state α-particle asymptotic normalization coefficients in 7 Be. The analysis highlights the need for low-energy scattering data with well-documented uncertainty information and shows how misleading results can be obtained in its absence.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗