A comparative study of stability methods for flexible satellites.

Abstract

This paper compares three approaches to the stability of hybrid dynamical systems, all three methods being based on the Liapunov direct method. The first method uses testing density functions, whereas the second involves defining certain integral coordinates. Both the method using testing density functions and the method of integral coordinates lead to closed-form stability criteria in terms of the system parameters. Criteria obtained using the method of integral coordinates are in general less restrictive than those derived by the method using testing density functions. On the other hand, the latter method is easier to apply and requires less work than the former. The third method is the standard modal analysis. The modal analysis generally yields more involved criteria, depending on the number of modes used to represent the elastic displacements. As an application, the attitude stability of an earth-pointing satellite with multi-elastic domains is investigated.