Remote sensing in Iowa agriculture

Abstract

The author has identified the following significant results. After receiving the ERTS-1 imagery, three methods of analysis of this imagery have been used. Observations noted are as follows: (1) Use of color additive and density slicing-color coding appears potentially useful for crop identification and automatic classification in Iowa for this time frame. The influence of soil association differences on the spectral response of the imagery will probably have to be taken into account for any automatic crop identification procedure to be successful. Small fields and the diversity of Iowa's cropping patterns also will cause significant problems for crop classifications. (2) The presence of high clouds and associated hazy atmospheric conditions markedly reduces the resolution of the ERTS-1 imagery. (3) Utilization of filtered 2 1/2 inch projectors is quite difficult because of multiple image registration problems. This procedure does, however, allow the interpreter to achieve image enlargement and the enhancement of response differences using two image projections.