Computer-based classification accuracy due to the spatial resolution using per-point versus per-field classification techniques

Abstract

Data sets simulating three different spatial resolutions (SR's) are computed from data with a 15-m nominal SR that were obtained with NASA's Thermatic Mapper Simulator from an altitude of about 6 km. The classification accuracies (CA's) achieved with the data of each of the four different SR's using a per-point Gaussian maximum likelihood classifier (GMLC) are intercompared. The CA's obtained using simulated 30-m SR data with the per-point GMLC are compared with the CA's achieved with a per-field classifier. It is found that: (1) the use of successively higher SR data resulted in lower overall CA's for classifications with the per-point GMLC, especially in cover classes associated with relatively higher spectral variability across adjacent pixels; (2) higher CA's were achieved using the per-field classifier with 30-m SR data than were achieved with the per-point GMLC; and (3) the largest increases in CA's were achieved with the per-field classifier in cover classes associated with relatively high levels of spectral variability across adjacent pixels.