Selection of a map grid for data analysis and archival

Abstract

Arguments for selection of a map grid are reiterated by illustrating the quantitative effects on data quality caused by using different grids. It is shown that the use of the rectangular latitude-longitude grid actually degrades data quality, increases stored data volume, and increases the complexity of data manipulation. Use of an equal-area grid is shown to be a proper way to aggregate data, but such grids are thought to be inconvenient. A solution to this dilemma is proposed by showing that the analysis and archival map grids need not be the same. The results of a proper analysis of the data on an equal-area grid can be remapped to the more 'convenient' rectangular latitude-longitude grid without loss of quality.