Reply

Abstract

A reply is made on behalf of the authors of Wiscombe et al. (1984) to comments of Hegg (1986) to the effect that the optically effective cloud drop radius r(eff) values used by Wiscombe are shown by more recent data to be underestimated. It is presently noted that cloud radiation studies have often not just used comparably small r(eff) values, but ignored large drops in calculations altogether, on the grounds that large drops must fall out of clouds very rapidly. Attention is given to total shortwave absorptivity, spectral albedo, and IR cooling rate near cloud tops.