Ganymede and Callisto

Abstract

The differences existing between Ganymede and Callisto are studied as well as their volcanic, tectonic, impact and surface processes. An attempt is made to explain the relatively vigorous history of geologic activity on Ganymede and the apparent lack of internal activity on Callisto. Observations reveal that the optical surfaces and regoliths of both bodies are ice rich, and thus unlikely to be remnants of a crust created by homogeneous accretion. Ganymede's relatively clean mantle was the source region for the water, slush, or ice that resurfaced more than half the satellite; this resurfacing material is structurally confined in broad rifts or troughs and is often captured to form grooved terrain. An explanation for resurfacing and tectonism on Ganymede and its near total absence on Callisto is that Ganymede is at least partially differentiated while Callisto is undifferentiated.