Search NASA⌕ Search

NASA NTRS · 19890010468

Autonomous satellite command and control: A comparison with other military systems

Abstract

Existing satellite concepts of operation depend on readily available experts and are extremely manpower intensive. Areas of expertise required include mission planning, mission data interpretation, telemetry monitoring, and anomaly resolution. The concepts of operation have envolved to their current state in part because space systems have tended to be treated more as research and development assets rather than as operational assets. These methods of satellite command and control will be inadequate in the future because of the availability, survivability, and capability of human experts. Because space systems have extremely high reliability and limited access, they offer challenges not found in other military systems. Thus, automation techniques used elsewhere are not necessarily applicable to space systems. A program to make satellites much more autonomous has been developed, using a variety of advanced software techniques. The problem the program is addressing, some possible solutions, the goals of the Rome Air Development Center (RADC) program, the rationale as to why the goals are reasonable, and the current program status are discussed. Also presented are some of the concepts used in the program and how they differ from more traditional approaches.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kruchten, Robert J., Todd, Wayne. 1988-11-01. Autonomous satellite command and control: A comparison with other military systems. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890010468

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.