Codes and modalities in multiple resources - A success and a qualification

Abstract

The relevance of codes and modalities in a multiple-resource model to the prediction of task interference was investigated in an experiment in which either verbal or spatial decision tasks, responded to with either voice or key press, were time-shared with second-order tracking. Results indicate the importance of the dichotomy between verbal and spatial processing codes in accounting for task interference. Interference with tracking was consistently greater, and difficulty/performance trade-offs were stronger, when the spatial decision task was performed and the manual response was used. A review of the literature on the interference between a continuous visual task and a discrete task whose modality is either auditory or visual suggests that scanning produces a dominant cost to intramodal configurations when visual channels are separated in space. In absence of visual separation, the differences between cross-modal and intramodal performance may be best accounted for by a mechanism of preemption.