Comparison of several system identification methods for flexible structures

Abstract

In the last few years various methods of identifying structural dynamics models from modal testing data have appeared. This paper presents a comparison of four of these algorithms: the Eigensystem Realization Algorithm (ERA), the modified version ERA/DC where DC indicates that it makes use of data correlations, the Q-Markov Cover algorithm, and an algorithm due to Moonen, DeMoor, Vandenberghe and Vandewalle. The comparison is made using a five mode computer model of the 20 meter Mini-Mast truss structure at NASA Langley Research Center, and various noise levels are superimposed to produce simulated data. The results show that for the example considered ERA/DC generally gives the best results; that ERA/DC is always at least as good as ERA which is shown to be a special case of ERA/DC; that Q-Markov requires the use of significantly more data than ERA/DC to produce comparable results; and that in some situations Q-Markov cannot produce comparable results.