Experiments and modeling

Abstract

The usual approach in establishing the correctness and accuracy of turbulence models is to numerically solve the modeled differential equations and then compare the results with the experiment. However, in the case of a discrepancy, this procedure does not pinpoint where in the model the drawback lies. It is also possible that the model overcompensates one physical phenomenon and undercompensates the other so that the net result is a good agreement between the two. Therefore, a more desirable approach is to directly compare the individual terms in the equations with their models. To achieve this objective, primary physical experiments were used to carry out the second moment budgets. These can then be used to analyze and assess various models and closure assumptions and seek improvements/modifications where models prove deficient.