Search NASASearch

NASA NTRS · 19950037643

Interpretation of waverider performance data using computational fluid dynamics

Abstract

A computational study was conducted to better understand experimental results obtained from wind-tunnel tests of a Mach 4 conical-flow-derived waverider and a comparative reference configuration, which showed that the aerodynamic performance of the reference configuration was slightly better than that of the waverider. The computational results showed that the predicted surface pressure values and the integrated lift and drag coefficients were much lower for the reference model because the reference model bottom is an expansion surface. However, the lift-drag ratios for the reference model were higher due to a relatively low drag for a comparable amount of lift. The results also showed that the reference model exhibited the same shock attachment characteristics as the conical-flow-derived waverider, and is therefore also a waverider. The shock attachment characteristic gives the waverider a performance advantage over conventional hypersonic vehicles, and the results suggest that altering the bottom surface does not cause significant performance degradation. Flowfield solutions also show that the conical-flow waverider model has better propulsion/airframe integration characteristics than the reference configuration. The results also suggest that generating flowfields other than conical ones may be used to design waveriders with improved aerodynamic performance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Cockrell, Charles E., Jr.. 1994-09-01. Interpretation of waverider performance data using computational fluid dynamics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19950037643

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Annual Research Briefs - 1996, Center for Turbulence Research

Partial contents include: (1) Simulation of jet impingement heat transfer with the k-e-V2 model; (2) A new methodology for turbulence modelers using Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) database analysis; (3) A particle representation model for the deformation of homogeneous turbulence; (4) Modeling of inhomogeneous compressible turbulence using a two-scale statistical theory; (5) Lewis number effects on partially premixed flames; (6) Conditional moment closure of mixing and reaction in turbulent non-premixed combustion; (7) Dynamic models for LES of turbulent front propagation with a spectral method; (8) Jet noise using large eddy simulation; (9) Towards numerical simulations of trailing-edge aeroacoustics; (10) A model for the onset of vortex breakdown; (11) Compressing an elliptic vortex: transition to turbulence by tumble breakdown; (12) A new method for the adaptive control of vortex-wall interactions; (13) Symmetries in turbulent boundary layer flows; (14) Near-wall models in large eddy simulations of flow behind a backward-facing step; (15) Assessment of the subgrid-scale models at low and high Reynolds numbers; (16) Large-eddy simulations of flow around a NACA 4412 airfoil using unstructured grids; (17) Progress on LES of flow past a circular cylinder; (18) Experimental investigation of flow through an asymmetric plane diffuser; (19) Progress in the large-eddy simulation of an asymmetric plane diffuser; (20) A numerical study of self-similarity in a turbulent plane wake using large-eddy simulation; (21) On the generation of turbulent inflow conditions for boundary layer simulations, and (22) A new class of finite difference schemes.

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS