Differences in Acceleration Training and Exercise Training on Resting Cardiovascular Variables

Abstract

The relative effects of alternating exercise vs. acclamation training an mean blood pressure (BP, Finapres), cardiac output (CO, BoMed) and peripheral resistance (PR, calculated) were evaluated. Six healthy men (33$\pm$(SD)6 yr. 178$\pm$4 cm, 86$\pm$6 kg) underwent exercise training (ET, n=3): supine on a cycle ergometer (40 to 90\% Vo$_{2}$ max) during exposure to constant+1G$_{z}$ for $\sim$30 min/day for 14 days on NASA's 1.9m Human Powered Centrifuge (HPC). They also underwent oscillatory (between +1 G$ {z}$and$\sim$2.5G$_{z}$) acceleration training (AT, n=3) for $\sim$30 min/day for 14 days on the HPC. After four weeks of ambulatory deconditioning, training protocols were switched. AT increased resting CO by 9.MpmS(SE)3.2\% (p$less than$0.05) with no effect on BF, and ET decreased BP by 9.2$\pm$4.6\% (p$less than$0.08) as well as spectral power of PR by 41$\pm$9\% (p$less than$0.05). The major effect of acceleration training was to increase resting cardiac output while that of exercise mining was to decrease resting blood pressure.