NASA NTRS ยท 20070004635
Constellation Stretch Goals: Review of Industry Inputs
Abstract
Many good ideas received based on industry experience: a) Shuttle operations; b) Commercial aircraft production; c) NASA's historical way of doing business; d) Military and commercial programs. Aerospace performed preliminary analysis: a) Potential savings; b) Cost of implementation; c) Performance or other impact/penalties; d) Roadblocks; e) Unintended consequences; f) Bottom line. Significant work ahead for a "Stretch Goal"to become a good, documented requirement: 1) As a group, the relative "value" of goals are uneven; 2) Focused analysis on each goal is required: a) Need to ensure that a new requirement produces the desired consequence; b) It is not certain that some goals will not create problems elsewhere. 3) Individual implementation path needs to be studied: a) Best place to insert requirement (what level, which document); b) Appropriate wording for the requirement. Many goals reflect "best practices" based on lessons learned and may have value beyond near-term CxP requirements process.
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Lang, John. 2006-12-19. Constellation Stretch Goals: Review of Industry Inputs. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20070004635
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.