DeCoM Validation

Abstract

Deepak Condenser Model (DeCoM) was validated in a two-step process. The first step validated DeCoM/TTH/FloCAD against a simplified 1D (1D fluid flow and 1D heat flow) scenario. Through this simplification the fluid calculations were simple enough that the results were comparable to hand calculations. Once a method was compared against 1D case, the next step was the verification against a 2D test case. 2D is only for heat flow, while the fluid flow is still 1D. The test data was obtained from the project Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) which performed a Looped Heat Pipe (LHP) test and contained necessary condenser information; such as a test point and condenser configuration. From the GLAS LHP test report, the construction of the LHP condenser and correlation was roughly possible. The assumptions and limitations are discussed, within this paper, of the 2D correlation. The success of DeCoM is illustrated by the results after correlation to the test data. Results show the differences between the model and the test setup, as well as explaining the probable cause for the differences; another set of results were produced after taking into account these differences, such as parasitic heat leak. Substantial effort has been made in listing the possibilities to further develop DECOM, thus to make it more reliable, user-friendly, and better integrated with generic SINDA models. The comparison of DeCoM to FloCAD and TTH LHP should not be taken as a definite answer to choosing DeCoM as a condenser modeler, rather as an alternate to obtaining preliminary results without the complexity of TTH LHP and license of FloCAD.