Search NASA⌕ Search

NASA NTRS · 20140002242

Global Air Quality and Climate

Abstract

Emissions of air pollutants and their precursors determine regional air quality and can alter climate. Climate change can perturb the long-range transport, chemical processing, and local meteorology that influence air pollution. We review the implications of projected changes in methane (CH4), ozone precursors (O3), and aerosols for climate (expressed in terms of the radiative forcing metric or changes in global surface temperature) and hemispheric-to-continental scale air quality. Reducing the O3 precursor CH4 would slow near-term warming by decreasing both CH4 and tropospheric O3. Uncertainty remains as to the net climate forcing from anthropogenic nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions, which increase tropospheric O3 (warming) but also increase aerosols and decrease CH4 (both cooling). Anthropogenic emissions of carbon monoxide (CO) and non-CH4 volatile organic compounds (NMVOC) warm by increasing both O3 and CH4. Radiative impacts from secondary organic aerosols (SOA) are poorly understood. Black carbon emission controls, by reducing the absorption of sunlight in the atmosphere and on snow and ice, have the potential to slow near-term warming, but uncertainties in coincident emissions of reflective (cooling) aerosols and poorly constrained cloud indirect effects confound robust estimates of net climate impacts. Reducing sulfate and nitrate aerosols would improve air quality and lessen interference with the hydrologic cycle, but lead to warming. A holistic and balanced view is thus needed to assess how air pollution controls influence climate; a first step towards this goal involves estimating net climate impacts from individual emission sectors. Modeling and observational analyses suggest a warming climate degrades air quality (increasing surface O3 and particulate matter) in many populated regions, including during pollution episodes. Prior Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scenarios (SRES) allowed unconstrained growth, whereas the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios assume uniformly an aggressive reduction, of air pollutant emissions. New estimates from the current generation of chemistry-climate models with RCP emissions thus project improved air quality over the next century relative to those using the IPCC SRES scenarios. These two sets of projections likely bracket possible futures. We find that uncertainty in emission-driven changes in air quality is generally greater than uncertainty in climate-driven changes. Confidence in air quality projections is limited by the reliability of anthropogenic emission trajectories and the uncertainties in regional climate responses, feedbacks with the terrestrial biosphere, and oxidation pathways affecting O3 and SOA.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fiore, Arlene M., Naik, Vaishali, Steiner, Allison, Unger, Nadine, Bergmann, Dan, Prather, Michael, Righi, Mattia, Rumbold, Steven T., Shindell, Drew T., Skeie, Ragnhild B., Sudo, Kengo, Szopa, Sophie, Horowitz, Larry W., Takemura, Toshihiko, Zeng, Guang, Cameron-Smith, Philip J., Cionni, Irene, Collins, William J., Dalsoren, Stig, Eyring, Veronika, Folberth, Gerd A., Ginoux, Paul, Josse, Batrice, Lamarque, Jean-Francois, OConnor, Fiona M., Mackenzie, Ian A., Nagashima, Tatsuya, Shindell, Drew Todd, Spracklen, Dominick V.. 2012-08-06. Global Air Quality and Climate. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20140002242

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Tropospheric and Stratospheric Ozone Profiles during the 2019 TROpomi vaLIdation eXperiment (TROLIX-19)

A TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) validation campaign was held in the Netherlands based at the CESAR (Cabauw Experimental Site for Atmospheric Research) observatory during September 2019. The TROpomi vaLIdation eXperiment (TROLIX-19) consisted of active and passive remote sensing platforms in conjunction with several balloon-borne and surface chemical (e.g., ozone and nitrogen dioxide) measurements. The goal of this joint NASA-KNMI geophysical validation campaign was to make intensive observations in the TROPOMI domain in order to be able to establish the quality of the L2 satellite data products under realistic conditions, such as non-idealized conditions with varying cloud cover and a range of atmospheric conditions at a rural site. The research presented here focuses on using ozone lidars from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center to better evaluate the characterization of ozone throughout TROLIX-19. Results of comparisons to the lidar systems with balloon, space-borne and ground-based passive measurements are shown. In addition, results are compared to a global coupled chemistry meteorology model to illustrate the vertical variability and columnar amounts of both tropospheric and stratospheric ozone during the campaign period.

ozone↗

Historical Total Ozone Radiative Forcing Derived from CMIP6 Simulations

Radiative forcing (RF) time series for total ozone from 1850 up to present-day are calculated based on historical simulations of ozone from 10 climate models contributing to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). In addition, RF is calculated for ozone fields prepared as input for CMIP6 models without chemistry schemes and from a chemical transport model simulation. A radiative kernel for ozone is constructed and used to derive the RF. The ozone RF in 2010 (200530 -2014) relative to 1850 is 0.35 W m-2 [0.08 to 0.61] (5-95% uncertainty range) based on models with both tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry. One of these models has a negative present-day total ozone RF. Excluding this model, the present-day ozone RF increases to 0.39 W m-2 [0.27 to 0.51] (533 - 95% uncertainty range). The rest of the models have RF close to or stronger than the RF time series assessed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in the fifth assessment report with the primary driver likely being the new precursor emissions used in CMIP6. The rapid adjustments beyond stratospheric temperature are estimated to be weak and thus the RF is a good measure of effective radiative forcing.

ozone↗

Representativeness of CO and O3 Along ATom Transects Derived from GEOS-5 and GMI-CTM Simulations

One major goal for the NASA Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom) is producing an observation-based chemical climatology to represent the atmospheric heterogeneity. In this study, we use CO and O3 observations and global atmospheric model simulations to examine the spatial representativeness of the ATom-1 and -2 transects within a 4D framework provided by the NASA GEOS-5 and GMI-CTM models. Based on the probability density functions, we find that the variability of CO and O3 along the flight tracks is well hindcast by the model when sampled per ATom flights. The CO variations along the ATom-transect are likely representative of the typical CO variations over the whole Pacific basin during both the ATom-1 and -2 periods, the northern Atlantic during the ATom-1 period, and the tropical Atlantic in the ATom-2 period. Over southern Atlantic, CO along the ATom-1 transects is likely less well mixed than that of the broader region, but is still representative of the median CO concentration. CO along the ATom-2 transect is likely higher than the median CO concentration over this region. For O3, the agreements between PDFs of O3 sampled along the ATom transects and over the broader regions are fair to good over all six regions (Scores > 0.65) with notable discrepancies over some regions. For example, in ATom-1 over the northern Pacific and Atlantic, the transect samples air masses with higher O3 levels. During ATom-2, the transect over-represents the occurrence of O3 plumes over tropical Pacific. Over the southern Pacific and Atlantic for both ATom-1 and -2, the transects have a less uniform distribution compared to the surrounding basins, but still represent the median O3 abundance. Overall, we conclude in most cases that ATom measurements represent the statistical variations of these two species over the ocean basins at the time of measurement. Higher-order statistics, including covariance of species, has not been tested in this study.

ozone↗