Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/NASA NTRS

NASA NTRS · 20140010394

Equivalent Sensor Radiance Generation and Remote Sensing from Model Parameters: Equivalent Sensor Radiance Formulation - Part 1

Wind, Galina·DaSilva, Arlindo M.·Norris, Peter M.·Platnick, Steven E.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper we describe a general procedure for calculating equivalent sensor radiances from variables output from a global atmospheric forecast model. In order to take proper account of the discrepancies between model resolution and sensor footprint the algorithm takes explicit account of the model subgrid variability, in particular its description of the probably density function of total water (vapor and cloud condensate.) The equivalent sensor radiances are then substituted into an operational remote sensing algorithm processing chain to produce a variety of remote sensing products that would normally be produced from actual sensor output. This output can then be used for a wide variety of purposes such as model parameter verification, remote sensing algorithm validation, testing of new retrieval methods and future sensor studies. We show a specific implementation using the GEOS-5 model, the MODIS instrument and the MODIS Adaptive Processing System (MODAPS) Data Collection 5.1 operational remote sensing cloud algorithm processing chain (including the cloud mask, cloud top properties and cloud optical and microphysical properties products.) We focus on clouds and cloud/aerosol interactions, because they are very important to model development and improvement.

Explore related subjects

SimulationsModelingRemote Sensing

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wind, Galina, DaSilva, Arlindo M., Norris, Peter M., Platnick, Steven E.. 2013-01-01. Equivalent Sensor Radiance Generation and Remote Sensing from Model Parameters: Equivalent Sensor Radiance Formulation - Part 1. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20140010394

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2022

Impact Simulation of Composite Panels for Aerospace Applications

The aerospace research community has been working towards the development of a comprehensive framework for the design of composite structures at the component, subassembly, assembly, and system levels. Such a framework requires accurate, efficient and easy-to-use mathematical and computational models that are in sync with physical reality. The research work in this paper is designed to help an aerospace structural engineer move towards this goal by simulating dynamic impact to composite panels. First, the existing orthotropic visco-elastic visco-plastic material model in LS-DYNA commercial finite element program, MAT_COMPOSITE_TABULATED_PLASTICITY_DAMAGE (MAT_213) is enhanced with the development and use of rate-dependent damage data. Using state-of-the-art experimental procedures, impact validation test data are created. Second, the versatility of the constitutive model is examined by its ability to simulate a low velocity (27 ft/s, 8 m/s) impact test, and two high velocity impact tests (385–417 ft/s, 117–127 m/s) that straddle the ballistic limit of the projectile and the composite panels. Third, these impact events are modeled using three different finite element types – under-integrated and fully-integrated solid elements, and fully-integrated thin shell elements. Insight into accuracy versus numerical efficiency is gained by comparing the performance of solid versus thin shell elements. The numerical results show that accurate predictions of these impact events can be obtained with reasonable effort and care.

Simulations↗
NASA NTRS2018

Full Facility Shock Frame Simulations of the Electric Arc Shock Tube

Radiative heating computations are performed for a range of high speed Earth entry experiments conducted in the Electric Arc Shock Tube at NASA Ames. The nonequilibrium radiative transport equations are solved in NEQAIR using flow field variables from the full facility CFD simulations of the EAST shock tube performed by US3D ow solver. These physics-based flow calculations lead to a significantly different post-shock gas state and associated radiation field as compared to that based on a simplified but computationally inexpensive calculation for flow over a blunt-body with appropriate initial conditions. The radiation spectra and radiance profiles are computed for an extensive range of wavelengths, from deep VUV to IR, which are pertinent to the emission characteristics of high enthalpy shock waves in air. The radiation properties of the shocked gas are calculated both in the nonequilibrium region at the shock, and in the equilibrium region behind the shock. Numerical predictions are found to be consistent with the experimental observations.

Simulations↗
NASA NTRS2016

Ab Initio Simulations of Phase Stability and Martensitic Transitions in NiTi

For NiTi based alloys, the shape memory effect is governed by a transition from a low-temperature martensite phase to a high-temperature austenite phase. Despite considerable experimental and computational work, basic questions regarding the stability of the phases and the martensitic phase transition remain unclear even for the simple case of binary, equiatomic NiTi. We perform ab initio molecular dynamics simulations to describe the temperature-dependent behavior of NiTi and resolve several of these outstanding issues. Structural correlation functions and finite temperature phonon spectra are evaluated to determine phase stability. We show that finite temperature, entropic effects stabilize the experimentally observed martensite (B19') and austenite (B2) phases while destabilizing the theoretically predicted (B33) phase. Free energy computations based on ab initio thermodynamic integration confirm these results and permit estimates of the transition temperature between the phases. In addition to the martensitic phase transition, we predict a new transition between the B33 and B19' phases. The role of defects in suppressing phase transformation temperatures is discussed.

Simulations↗