Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/NASA NTRS

NASA NTRS · 20140011363

The Version 8.6 SBUV Ozone Data Record: An Overview

McPeters, Richard D.·Bhartia, P. K.·Haffner, D.·Labow, Gordon J.·Flynn, Larry
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Under a NASA program to produce long-term data records from instruments on multiple satellites, data from a series of nine Solar Backscatter Ultraviolet (SBUV and SBUV2) instruments have been re-processed to create a coherent ozone time series. Data from the BUV instrument on Nimbus 4, SBUV on Nimbus 7, and SBUV2 instruments on NOAA 9, 11, 14, 16, 17, 18, and 19 covering the period 1970-1972 and 1979-2011 were used to create a long-term data set. The goal is an ozone Earth Science Data Record - a consistent, calibrated ozone time series that can be used for trend analyses and other studies. In order to create this ozone data set, the radiances were adjusted and used to re-process the entire data records for each of the nine instruments. Inter-instrument comparisons during periods of overlap as well as comparisons with data from other satellite and ground-based instruments were used to evaluate the consistency of the record and make calibration adjustments as needed. Additional improvements in this version 8.6 processing included the use of the Brion, Daumont, and Malicet ozone cross sections, and a cloud-height climatology derived from Aura OMI measurements. Validation of the re-processed ozone shows that total column ozone is consistent with the Brewer Dobson network to within about 1 for the new time series. Comparisons with MLS, SAGE, sondes, and lidar show that ozone at individual levels in the stratosphere is generally consistent to within 5 percent.

Explore related subjects

ozoneSolar Backscatter Ultraviolet (SBUV and SBUV/2) instrumentsand Malicetthe BrionDaumont

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

McPeters, Richard D., Bhartia, P. K., Haffner, D., Labow, Gordon J., Flynn, Larry. 2013-07-27. The Version 8.6 SBUV Ozone Data Record: An Overview. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20140011363

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2022

Tropospheric and Stratospheric Ozone Profiles during the 2019 TROpomi vaLIdation eXperiment (TROLIX-19)

A TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) validation campaign was held in the Netherlands based at the CESAR (Cabauw Experimental Site for Atmospheric Research) observatory during September 2019. The TROpomi vaLIdation eXperiment (TROLIX-19) consisted of active and passive remote sensing platforms in conjunction with several balloon-borne and surface chemical (e.g., ozone and nitrogen dioxide) measurements. The goal of this joint NASA-KNMI geophysical validation campaign was to make intensive observations in the TROPOMI domain in order to be able to establish the quality of the L2 satellite data products under realistic conditions, such as non-idealized conditions with varying cloud cover and a range of atmospheric conditions at a rural site. The research presented here focuses on using ozone lidars from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center to better evaluate the characterization of ozone throughout TROLIX-19. Results of comparisons to the lidar systems with balloon, space-borne and ground-based passive measurements are shown. In addition, results are compared to a global coupled chemistry meteorology model to illustrate the vertical variability and columnar amounts of both tropospheric and stratospheric ozone during the campaign period.

ozone↗
NASA NTRS2020

Historical Total Ozone Radiative Forcing Derived from CMIP6 Simulations

Radiative forcing (RF) time series for total ozone from 1850 up to present-day are calculated based on historical simulations of ozone from 10 climate models contributing to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). In addition, RF is calculated for ozone fields prepared as input for CMIP6 models without chemistry schemes and from a chemical transport model simulation. A radiative kernel for ozone is constructed and used to derive the RF. The ozone RF in 2010 (200530 -2014) relative to 1850 is 0.35 W m-2 [0.08 to 0.61] (5-95% uncertainty range) based on models with both tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry. One of these models has a negative present-day total ozone RF. Excluding this model, the present-day ozone RF increases to 0.39 W m-2 [0.27 to 0.51] (533 - 95% uncertainty range). The rest of the models have RF close to or stronger than the RF time series assessed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in the fifth assessment report with the primary driver likely being the new precursor emissions used in CMIP6. The rapid adjustments beyond stratospheric temperature are estimated to be weak and thus the RF is a good measure of effective radiative forcing.

ozone↗
NASA NTRS2018

Representativeness of CO and O3 Along ATom Transects Derived from GEOS-5 and GMI-CTM Simulations

One major goal for the NASA Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom) is producing an observation-based chemical climatology to represent the atmospheric heterogeneity. In this study, we use CO and O3 observations and global atmospheric model simulations to examine the spatial representativeness of the ATom-1 and -2 transects within a 4D framework provided by the NASA GEOS-5 and GMI-CTM models. Based on the probability density functions, we find that the variability of CO and O3 along the flight tracks is well hindcast by the model when sampled per ATom flights. The CO variations along the ATom-transect are likely representative of the typical CO variations over the whole Pacific basin during both the ATom-1 and -2 periods, the northern Atlantic during the ATom-1 period, and the tropical Atlantic in the ATom-2 period. Over southern Atlantic, CO along the ATom-1 transects is likely less well mixed than that of the broader region, but is still representative of the median CO concentration. CO along the ATom-2 transect is likely higher than the median CO concentration over this region. For O3, the agreements between PDFs of O3 sampled along the ATom transects and over the broader regions are fair to good over all six regions (Scores > 0.65) with notable discrepancies over some regions. For example, in ATom-1 over the northern Pacific and Atlantic, the transect samples air masses with higher O3 levels. During ATom-2, the transect over-represents the occurrence of O3 plumes over tropical Pacific. Over the southern Pacific and Atlantic for both ATom-1 and -2, the transects have a less uniform distribution compared to the surrounding basins, but still represent the median O3 abundance. Overall, we conclude in most cases that ATom measurements represent the statistical variations of these two species over the ocean basins at the time of measurement. Higher-order statistics, including covariance of species, has not been tested in this study.

ozone↗