Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/NASA NTRS

NASA NTRS · 20150000252

A Terminal Area Icing Remote Sensing System

Reehorst, Andrew L.·Serke, David J.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

NASA and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) have developed an icing remote sensing technology that has demonstrated skill at detecting and classifying icing hazards in a vertical column above an instrumented ground station. This technology is now being extended to provide volumetric coverage surrounding an airport. With volumetric airport terminal area coverage, the resulting icing hazard information will be usable by aircrews, traffic control, and airline dispatch to make strategic and tactical decisions regarding routing when conditions are conducive to airframe icing. Building on the existing vertical pointing system, the new method for providing volumetric coverage will utilize cloud radar, microwave radiometry, and NEXRAD radar. This terminal area icing remote sensing system will use the data streams from these instruments to provide icing hazard classification along the defined approach paths into an airport. Strategies for comparison to in-situ instruments on aircraft and weather balloons for a planned NASA field test are discussed, as are possible future applications into the NextGen airspace system.

Explore related subjects

aircraft icingmicrowave radiometersflight safety

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Reehorst, Andrew L., Serke, David J.. 2014-11-01. A Terminal Area Icing Remote Sensing System. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20150000252

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2017

An Integrated Approach to Swept Wing Icing Simulation

This presentation describes the various elements of a simulation approach used to develop a database of ice shape geometries and the resulting aerodynamic performance data for a representative commercial transport wing model exposed to a variety of icing conditions. Methods for capturing full three-dimensional ice shape geometries, geometry interpolation along the span of the wing, and creation of artificial ice shapes based upon that geometric data were developed for this effort. The icing conditions used for this effort were representative of actual ice shape encounter scenarios and run the gamut from ice roughness to full three-dimensional scalloped ice shapes.

aircraft icing↗
NASA NTRS2017

Bimodal SLD Ice Accretion on a NACA 0012 Airfoil Model

An initial ice shape database has been created to document ice accretions on a 21-inch chord NACA 0012 airfoil model resulting from an exposure to a Supercooled Large Droplet (SLD) icing cloud with a bimodal droplet distribution. The ice shapes created were documented with photographs, laser scanned surface measurements over a section of the model span, and measurement of the ice mass over the same section of each accretion. The icing conditions used in the test matrix were based upon previously measured ice shapes on the same model to connect the current database to previously measured information. Ice shapes resulting from the bimodal distribution as well as from equivalent standard droplet distributions were obtained and compared. Results indicate that the ice shapes resulting from the bimodal droplet distributions had higher mass and volume values than their standard distribution equivalents as well as having icing limits that extended further back on the chord of the model.

aircraft icing↗
NASA NTRS2016

An Assessment of the Icing Blade and the SEA Multi-Element Sensor for Liquid Water Content Calibration of the NASA GRC Icing Research Tunnel

The Icing Research Tunnel at NASA Glenn has recently switched from using the Icing Blade to using the SEA Multi-Element Sensor (also known as the multi-wire) for its calibration of cloud liquid water content. In order to peform this transition, tests were completed to compare the Multi-Element Sensor to the Icing Blade, particularly with respect to liquid water content, airspeed, and drop size. The two instruments were found to compare well for the majority of Appendix C conditions. However, it was discovered that the Icing Blade under-measures when the conditions approach the Ludlam Limit. This paper also describes data processing procedures for the Multi-Element Sensor in the IRT, including collision efficiency corrections, mounting underneath a splitter plate, and correcting for a jump in the compensation wire power. Further data is presented to describe the repeatability of the IRT with the Multi-Element Sensor, health-monitoring checks for the instrument, and a sensing-element configuration comparison. Ultimately these tests showed that in the IRT, the multi-wire is a better instrument for measuring cloud liquid water content than the blade.

aircraft icing↗