NASA NTRS · 20150023398
Comparing and Contrasting Detectors: JWST NIR vs HST WFC3
Abstract
In many ways, WFC3s IR channel is a good indicator for what to expect with JWST. There are some differences, most of which should be beneficial in JWST- JWSTs lower operating temperature will freeze out charge traps that would affect WFC3. Benefits should include lower dark current, lower persistence, and better reciprocity- JWSTs more recent HgCdTe process has lower defect density. The benefits are as described above- JWST uses better indium barriers. The benefits should include fewer RC type pixels. One area where more study might be beneficial is stability. The detector electronics play a significant role in determining how stable a detector system is(v.s. bias drifts and photometry). JWSTs SIDECARs are completely WFC3s Ball electronics- Studies comparing the bias and photometric stability of WFC3 and JWST might be useful to informing data acquisition and calibration strategies for JWST.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Rauscher, Bernard J.. 2015-11-16. Comparing and Contrasting Detectors: JWST NIR vs HST WFC3. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20150023398
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.